• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

Read the Memorandum That May Drown the MID in Falling Water

October 14, 2012 By Eric Caine 2 Comments

 

 

Having trouble balancing the books?

The Valley Citizen has obtained an internal Modesto Irrigation District (MID) memorandum. Almost ten pages long, the memorandum provides legal analysis of possible consequences for the MID of Proposition 26.

Proposition 26 was approved by California voters in 2010. Its purpose was to prohibit unjustified fees and costs imposed by entities that provide public services.

In 1995, the MID added a “Falling Water Charge” to its bill for electrical ratepayers. The Charge was folded into the bill without explanation.

The MID internal memo offers both a “best case” and “worst case” scenario for the MID. In the best case, the Falling Water Charge will not be called an illegal tax under the definition established by Proposition 26. Unfortunately for the MID, the worst case scenario seems far more likely. In the worst case scenario, the Falling Water Charge is ruled an illegal and unjustified tax.

Early into the analysis, the memorandum’s author writes,

“The Falling Water Charge is not based upon costs incurred by the Irrigation Division relative to the generation of hydroelectric power for the Electrical Division. Instead, the Falling Water Charge is an effort to enable the Irrigation Division to recover from the Electrical Division the value of the use of Don Pedro Dam.”

The analyst then explains how the “value of the use of Don Pedro Dam” is calculated. It’s done by using a, “production cost model to determine the gross market value of the average hydro year Don Pedro generation to MID.” There is no further explanation of the “production cost model.”

The Falling Water Charge is then calculated as, “the difference between the Falling Water Value and assigned expenses, including operation and maintenance, administrative and general, and debt service.”

As abstract and arbitrary as these calculations may seem, anyone wishing for more detail and justification won’t find them by reading further into the memorandum. Instead, there follows a series of ever more damning conclusions that reveal just how arbitrary the Falling Water Charge really is. Here’s one:

“MID makes no effort to identify the costs incurred by the Irrigation Division related to the generation of hydroelectric power by the Electrical Division…Indeed, the flat rate formula that is used to establish the Falling Water Charge does not even take actual costs of repair, maintenance, upkeep, operation, or debt service into account.”

The analyst then adds that the Falling Water Charge, “can (and almost certainly does) go up without regard to a corresponding increase in costs incurred by the Irrigation Division.”

Two paragraphs later, this conclusion is recapitulated even more emphatically:

“MID has not made an effort to identify the costs incurred by the Irrigation Division in providing water for the generation of hydroelectric power to the Electrical Division. Thus, while it is certainly true that the Irrigation Division can charge the Electrical Division for costs incurred  by the Irrigation Division in providing water to the Electrical Division for the generation of hydroelectric power, it cannot do so unless and until it makes a reasonable, good faith effort to identify such costs.”

It may be that MID Directors and management will find a way to avoid the most severe legal consequences of Proposition 26, but answering to angry ratepayers will pose an even bigger problem.

The Falling Water Charge in 2011 alone was $10,158,720. Even spread over the MID’s 111,000 electrical accounts, it’s a lot of money. And that’s just one year. Spread over the seventeen years since it’s been in effect, the Falling Water Charge is going to amount to very big bucks.

With the exception of newly elected directors Larry Byrd and Nick Blom, who can’t be held accountable for the Falling Water Charge, MID officials are going to have a hard time explaining why electrical rate payers have been for seventeen years paying hidden and unspecified costs to a separate branch of the MID for no services rendered.

In fact, it probably wouldn’t surprise anyone if they found themselves barricaded in the MID Boardroom surrounded by angry citizens brandishing torches and pitchforks. Read the memorandum here .

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured, History Tagged With: MID Falling Water Charge, MID Falling Water Memorandum

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Chris Gulick says

    October 14, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    Keep the fire lit on this Mr. Caine.
    The MID board needs to be held accountable and heads should roll.
    I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the good ole boy network to comment on this much less any mention in the local rag so social media once again proves it’s worth.
    Hopefully this scam will put all irrigation districts on notice that they better have their books in order.
    MID isn’t just screwing their customers while padding their buddies pockets.
    The are violating the public trust and should be forced to face the consequences.

    Reply
  2. John Wagner says

    October 15, 2012 at 12:10 am

    WOW! You can bet MID is scrambling right now in full damage control mode, with this damning memo open for all to see. They are clearly and consciously sticking it to their ratepayers, with wispy, undefinable costs in the multi-millions each year — over $10 Million in 2010 alone!

    Kudos to you and The Valley Citizen for turning over the rock that revealed this particularly ugly fiscal secret beneath! It sounds like the next MID Board meeting could be the best show in town if you or another responsible citizen raises the issue further into the public’s view.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Chris Gulick Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Since the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, former President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have pushed false and misleading accounts to downplay the event that left five dead and scores of others wounded. His supporters appear to have listened.
www.reuters.com
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
On a leaked conference call, leaders of dark-money groups and an aide to Mitch McConnell expressed frustration with the popularity of the legislation, even among Republican voters.
www.newyorker.com
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
Taxes on the richest New Zealanders are being raised
www.independent.co.uk
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
Olympia, Washington, is a microcosm of the problems created by the emptying of mental hospitals.
www.city-journal.org
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
Key legislators push duplexes, looser regulations and more money to boost housing supply.
calmatters.org
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let's fix it – here's how | Bernie Sanders
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let’s fix it – here’s how | Bernie Sanders
While working people toil, the richest have never have it so good. It’s time to fight back – our democracy depends on it
www.theguardian.com
Sen. Bernie Sanders' Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A 'Rigged' Tax System
Sen. Bernie Sanders’ Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A ‘Rigged’ Tax System
Sanders will introduce legislation Thursday to restore the corporate tax rate to 35% and add a new progressive tax on the estates of the wealthiest Americans.
www.npr.org
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
No, it’s not just an inner city problem. And it’s not the result of individual failure.
www.washingtonpost.com
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Echo Park Lake site has become a battleground in the city’s worsening housing and homelessness crisis during the pandemic
www.theguardian.com
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama - The Bulwark
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama – The Bulwark
It’s about workplace democracy, and could affect not just the tech giant’s employees but those of other firms.
thebulwark.com
Farms, feathers, and fins share water in California
Farms, feathers, and fins share water in California
A coalition of conservation non-profits is creating innovative ways to put farmland to work supporting wildlife.
grist.org
Evidence indicates sedition charges likely over Capitol riots, prosecutor says
Evidence indicates sedition charges likely over Capitol riots, prosecutor says
Michael Sherwin, the federal prosecutor who until recently was leading the criminal investigation into the Capitol riots, told CBS’ “60 Minutes” Sunday that evidence indicates sedition charges will be laid against some suspects. Why it matters:
www.yahoo.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design