• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

132 Freeway Will Be an Environmental Disaster

July 21, 2017 By admin 1 Comment

More traffic on the way?

Environmentalists are notorious about opposing freeway projects , but the Sierra Club and other environmental organizations have been quiet about the 132 freeway plan. Either the project has not caught their attention or they just don’t care about the  Valley because local politics are dominated by anti-environment interest groups. Regardless of the reasons for political silence, a discussion is needed because the 132 freeway will be a disaster.

Wildlife Refuge

State Route 132 runs through a wildlife refuge where it crosses the San Joaquin River flood plain. A multitude of bird species and other wildlife inhabit the refuge, which floods during wet years. The freeway project will bring thousands of more cars daily through the wetlands, diverting Bay Area traffic from freeways 99, 120, and 205.  No environmental impact study has been done for sensitive species since 2003 or earlier. Caltrans simply made a negative declaration in its environmental impact report.

Route 132 is a winding levee road through the wildlife refuge. Impact on the levee itself from added traffic was not considered because that section of roadway will not be improved during the first phase of the freeway construction project.

More Traffic Congestion

The first phase of the Route 132 Freeway Project will only build from Freeway 99 west to Dakota Road. Like a dam breaking, the project will release a flood of cars onto a two lane facility and then route traffic onto the old road at Dakota Avenue.  Already congested during rush hour, the new route will add more cars and trucks, increase air pollution and noise all along the route, and result in a torturous driving experience.

Proponents say that the new facility will shorten travel time from Modesto to the Bay Area.  Added congestion will more than offset any benefit of the new roadway. Travel time will increase due to congestion; more traffic will result in more artery clogging delays from accidents.

The Caltrans philosophy is to create more congestion so that more money can be secured to build more roads. By making Route 132 more congested, the logic goes, more money will come sooner to build more freeways. Degradation of the environment is not a consideration.

Building Over a Toxic Waste Dump

On the east end of the 132 Freeway project, Caltrans plans to build on top of a toxic waste dump currently in the right of way near Emerald Avenue in Modesto.  The thinking is if concrete is put on top, no one will notice the dump. Caltrans says the proposal is a safe way of handling toxic waste, ignoring the fact that concrete deteriorates over time and that water will eventually seep into the dump and endanger groundwater.

In time, everyone will forget that the dump exists.  Who cares about the health of future generations anyway?

More Congestion

At the intersection of the 132 Freeway and 99 Freeway, Caltrans will not be building a flyover from northbound 99 to westbound 132.  Instead, traffic will exit to a signalized intersection at Needham and Franklin Avenues and then turn west onto route 132.  The intersection will be congested as large numbers of vehicles from three arterials will need to go through it, including Kansas Avenue, Needham Avenue, and the 99 Freeway.  The congestion will delay motorists and add to air pollution.

Further Delays

Currently, the only traffic signal between Interstate 580 and Carpenter Road is at Hart Road.  During rush hour, the back-up and delay at the signal can be considerable.  The new project will add signals at Dakota and the new freeway (presently called expressway until it is upgraded to a freeway in 10-20 years) and at Dakota and Maze.  Imagine how two new signals will degrade traffic, add to travel time and add air pollution.

Why Do This Project?

Given the amount of environmental degradation, added traffic congestion, and added travel time this “road improvement” will cause, why would anyone want the project built  with the current planned configuration?

Considering the project was originally planned over 50 years ago, the delay in starting was not only warranted, but continues to be justified. Caltrans says it can’t do a better project because not enough money is available to build it right.  If it can’t be done right, why do it at all?

 

Filed Under: Environment, Featured Tagged With: Highway 132 barium, Highway 132 expansion, Highway 132 Freeway Project

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bruce Frohman says

    July 22, 2017 at 1:43 pm

    Caltrans has just installed a traffic signal at Route 132 and Kasson Road/River Road, just west of the San Joaquin River. The intersection will cause greater congestion on the 132 corridor. If a Freeway is planned, why wasn’t an interchange built? The Caltrans answer is that a signal is cheaper. However, in the long run, the total cost to the public will be much greater. Congestion is costly, signalized intersections have more accidents, and the road will need to be improved and upgraded twice. Caltrans has gotten away with this method of waste of taxpayer money for years because no one challenges them. When was the last time you heard of any serious legislative oversight? The last review was the Bay Bridge Fiasco.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bruce Frohman Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

WATCH: The Moment When The ?2,000 Mules? Folks Admit Their Supposed Evidence Is Nonsense
WATCH: The Moment When The “2,000 Mules” Folks Admit Their Supposed Evidence Is Nonsense
True believers in Donald Trump?s lies about the 2020 election gathered in…
talkingpointsmemo.com
Four things to know about Colorado River water in California
Four things to know about Colorado River water in California
As California and six other western states scramble to reach a deal to cut use of Colorado River water, what will the federal government do?
calmatters.org
A disastrous 'megaflood' flood in sunny and dry California? It's happened before
A disastrous ‘megaflood’ flood in sunny and dry California? It’s happened before
Scientists say climate change increases the likelihood of the recurrence of a ‘megaflood’ like the Great Flood of 1862.
www.usatoday.com
'He Was a Crook'
‘He Was a Crook’
www.theatlantic.com
Opinion | When America Joined the Cult of the Confederacy
Opinion | When America Joined the Cult of the Confederacy
By renaming military bases, the Defense Department dismantles an enduring legacy of the Lost Cause.
www.nytimes.com
What?s driving the massive, destructive rainfalls around the country
What’s driving the massive, destructive rainfalls around the country
“The infrastructure we have is really built for a climate we are not living in anymore,” said one scientist who studies extreme precipitation.
www.washingtonpost.com
How California stands to gain from historic new climate and energy bill
How California stands to gain from historic new climate and energy bill
Billions for electric cars, solar and wind power are expected to boost state’s clean energy efforts and industries
www.mercurynews.com
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals
www.newyorker.com
Water wars in a drying California: New money vs. old power in San Joaquin Valley
Water wars in a drying California: New money vs. old power in San Joaquin Valley
www.mercurynews.com
History of DDT ocean dumping off L.A. coast even worse than expected, EPA finds
History of DDT ocean dumping off L.A. coast even worse than expected, EPA finds
Barrels of DDT waste, along with other chemicals, were likely poured directly into the ocean near Catalina Island, according to federal regulators.
www.latimes.com
The Tiny Bird Ruining East Coast Beach Vacations
The Tiny Bird Ruining East Coast Beach Vacations
Meet the piping plover, an adorable little bird whose tenuous existence shuts down roads and beaches right in the peak of summer.
www.thedailybeast.com
Will the last person to leave Phoenix please turn off the sun?
Will the last person to leave Phoenix please turn off the sun?
Asking when Phoenix will become uninhabitable means asking who has the resources to survive — and eventually, the rich might be the only ones left
www.salon.com
California drought official quits, blasting Newsom for 'gut wrenching' inaction
California drought official quits, blasting Newsom for ‘gut wrenching’ inaction
A state water board official has resigned, claiming the Newsom administration has “nearly eviscerated” the board’s ability to confront drought.
www.latimes.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design