• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

Another Huge Loss for Oakdale Irrigation District

November 28, 2018 By Eric Caine 2 Comments

Gail Altieri and Landa Santos, City Towers, Modesto

For any other public entity, the loss suffered on November 27 by Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) in Fresno’s Fifth Appellate District Court would amount to a wake-up call, but given the resistance to facts of three of its board members, General Manager and water attorney, it’s unlikely any of them will come away with a lesson learned.

This, after all, is the water district whose own attorney told them they would need an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) before instituting a fallowing program and subsequent water sale and then failed to perform the review. As if that weren’t enough, after getting caught failing to perform the review, the same OID attorney who had recommended the review argued in court the review wasn’t needed.

OID Board members should have gotten a clue last year when Superior Court Judge Roger Beauchesne lectured their attorneys about the use of ad hominem arguments in a court of law and went so far as to read aloud the definition. They should have realized they had no case at all when Judge Beauchesne wrote that the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance (OGA) had provided a “public service” by insisting OID should do an EIR. Instead, OID Board Members and management decided to appeal Beuchesne’s decision.

Actually, to be entirely accurate, it was three of the five board members who supported the appeal. The two women on the board, Gail Altieri and Linda Santos, had argued from the beginning that OID should perform required EIRs before offering fallowing programs and selling water. And just for their troubles, their fellow board members sued them and slapped them with an injunction.

Yes, that’s right. When Altieri and Santos offered truthful testimony to Judge Beauchesne, their fellow board members accused them of revealing details discussed in an OID closed session and tried to muzzle them. In that case, the judge told OID the injunction, “would amount to placing handcuffs on Defendants’ ability to effectively operate as duly elected members of the Plaintiff’s Board of Directors,” and ruled against the district. OID then appealed that decision; the appeal is still pending.

But for OID Board members Herman Doornebal, Brad DeBoer, and Tom Orvis, court losses, facts and the law are just bumps in the road on the way to their yearly mission of selling water to buyers down south so a few OID farmers can get their own water below the cost of delivery. And the fallowing program? Just another cash cow for district farmers.

Theoretically, OID farmers receive cash credits to “improve” fallowed land. The improvements are usually in the form of replacing rangeland with almond orchards. The water saved from the fallowed land is then sold to buyers outside the district—most often Westlands Water District.

Touted by OID management as a “win/win,” the fallowing plan violates any number of directives imposed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) but could conceivably be successful if OID performed the required EIR. OGA members Louis Brichetto and Robert Frobose have argued that the major flaw in the plan is its failure to address effects on groundwater.

OID’s own studies show a consistent decline in the local groundwater basin. Coupled with water sales outside the district, the decline would seem to most observers to represent a failure to comply with requirements imposed by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), a new state program designed to prevent the depletion of the state’s rapidly disappearing groundwater.

The most obvious way to address declines in groundwater is by the application of surface water in lieu of pumping. Just outside OID’s boundaries, but still within its sphere of influence, tens of thousands of acres of almond orchards are wholly dependent on groundwater. Most of the owners of those orchards would prefer to buy OID surface water, but the district has thus far preferred to sell outside the region.

OID has responded to court restrictions on water sales in a number of ways, including by temporarily abandoning its own water rights so that the so-called “surplus” water can be sold outside the district. When OID’s most recent attempt at a fallowing program ran into the brick wall of CEQA requirements, OID went ahead and paid farmers to fallow anyway, even without the compensation of a water sale.

The biggest payout—$331,000— went to OID farmer John Brichetto. Other payouts amounted to additional hundreds of thousands of dollars.

While OID’s water policies may seem complex and labyrinthine to the casual observer, they boil down to a relatively simple principle. The fundamental rule is to provide district farmers with water below the cost of delivery. Without public scrutiny, the simplest way to do so is by selling water to buyers outside the region.

Louis Brichetto, attorney Patrick Soluri, Bob Frobose, City Towers, Modesto

But given public scrutiny, OID’s programs reveal a fundamental violation of the public trust. By selling local water outside the region, OID is hurting the common interest in favor of subsidizing a few farmers, many of them very wealthy. The subsidies—really just payouts in some cases—result in favorable votes for those OID board members who support water sales. It’s a circle of payouts and vote-buying much like one might see in a banana republic.

In this latest case of rebuke by the court of appeals, OID is required to pay not only its own court costs, but those of the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance. The total will almost certainly be well over half a million dollars. Coupled with payouts for a fallowing program that was never court-approved, OID has paid a few powerful farmers millions of dollars strictly on the basis of their wealth and power. That’s not a public institution, it’s an oligarchy. OID Board members Doornenbal, DeBoer, and Orvis have a lot to answer for.

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: Gail Altieri, Linda Santos Oakdale Irrigation District, Oakdale Irrigation District Fallowing Program, Oakdale Irrigation District water sales

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Damon Woods says

    November 28, 2018 at 8:22 pm

    I sure hope OID learns a lesson.

    Reply
  2. Portugal says

    January 26, 2020 at 12:35 am

    In the process, the board will have to answer a fundamental question: how much water do Californians need and how much should be left for endangered fish?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Californians: Here's why your housing costs are so high
Californians: Here’s why your housing costs are so high
Half the state’s households struggle to afford the roof over their heads. Here’s what you need to know about one of California’s most vexing issues.
calmatters.org
Las Vegas Pushes to Become First City to Ban Ornamental Grass
Las Vegas Pushes to Become First City to Ban Ornamental Grass
A desert city built on a reputation for excess and indulgence wants to become a model for restraint and conservation with a first-in-the-nation policy banning grass that nobody walks on. Las Vegas-area water officials have spent two decades trying to get people to replace thirsty greenery with desert plants, and now they’re asking the Nevada Legislature to outlaw roughly 40% of the turf that’s left. The Southern Nevada Water Authority estimates there are almost 8 square miles (21 square kilometers) of “nonfunctional turf” in the metro area, grass that no one ever walks on or otherwise uses in
www.voanews.com
Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Since the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, former President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have pushed false and misleading accounts to downplay the event that left five dead and scores of others wounded. His supporters appear to have listened.
www.reuters.com
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
On a leaked conference call, leaders of dark-money groups and an aide to Mitch McConnell expressed frustration with the popularity of the legislation, even among Republican voters.
www.newyorker.com
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
Taxes on the richest New Zealanders are being raised
www.independent.co.uk
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
Olympia, Washington, is a microcosm of the problems created by the emptying of mental hospitals.
www.city-journal.org
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
Key legislators push duplexes, looser regulations and more money to boost housing supply.
calmatters.org
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let's fix it – here's how | Bernie Sanders
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let’s fix it – here’s how | Bernie Sanders
While working people toil, the richest have never have it so good. It’s time to fight back – our democracy depends on it
www.theguardian.com
Sen. Bernie Sanders' Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A 'Rigged' Tax System
Sen. Bernie Sanders’ Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A ‘Rigged’ Tax System
Sanders will introduce legislation Thursday to restore the corporate tax rate to 35% and add a new progressive tax on the estates of the wealthiest Americans.
www.npr.org
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
No, it’s not just an inner city problem. And it’s not the result of individual failure.
www.washingtonpost.com
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Echo Park Lake site has become a battleground in the city’s worsening housing and homelessness crisis during the pandemic
www.theguardian.com
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama - The Bulwark
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama – The Bulwark
It’s about workplace democracy, and could affect not just the tech giant’s employees but those of other firms.
thebulwark.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design