• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

Another Huge Loss for Oakdale Irrigation District

November 28, 2018 By Eric Caine 2 Comments

Gail Altieri and Landa Santos, City Towers, Modesto

For any other public entity, the loss suffered on November 27 by Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) in Fresno’s Fifth Appellate District Court would amount to a wake-up call, but given the resistance to facts of three of its board members, General Manager and water attorney, it’s unlikely any of them will come away with a lesson learned.

This, after all, is the water district whose own attorney told them they would need an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) before instituting a fallowing program and subsequent water sale and then failed to perform the review. As if that weren’t enough, after getting caught failing to perform the review, the same OID attorney who had recommended the review argued in court the review wasn’t needed.

OID Board members should have gotten a clue last year when Superior Court Judge Roger Beauchesne lectured their attorneys about the use of ad hominem arguments in a court of law and went so far as to read aloud the definition. They should have realized they had no case at all when Judge Beauchesne wrote that the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance (OGA) had provided a “public service” by insisting OID should do an EIR. Instead, OID Board Members and management decided to appeal Beuchesne’s decision.

Actually, to be entirely accurate, it was three of the five board members who supported the appeal. The two women on the board, Gail Altieri and Linda Santos, had argued from the beginning that OID should perform required EIRs before offering fallowing programs and selling water. And just for their troubles, their fellow board members sued them and slapped them with an injunction.

Yes, that’s right. When Altieri and Santos offered truthful testimony to Judge Beauchesne, their fellow board members accused them of revealing details discussed in an OID closed session and tried to muzzle them. In that case, the judge told OID the injunction, “would amount to placing handcuffs on Defendants’ ability to effectively operate as duly elected members of the Plaintiff’s Board of Directors,” and ruled against the district. OID then appealed that decision; the appeal is still pending.

But for OID Board members Herman Doornebal, Brad DeBoer, and Tom Orvis, court losses, facts and the law are just bumps in the road on the way to their yearly mission of selling water to buyers down south so a few OID farmers can get their own water below the cost of delivery. And the fallowing program? Just another cash cow for district farmers.

Theoretically, OID farmers receive cash credits to “improve” fallowed land. The improvements are usually in the form of replacing rangeland with almond orchards. The water saved from the fallowed land is then sold to buyers outside the district—most often Westlands Water District.

Touted by OID management as a “win/win,” the fallowing plan violates any number of directives imposed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) but could conceivably be successful if OID performed the required EIR. OGA members Louis Brichetto and Robert Frobose have argued that the major flaw in the plan is its failure to address effects on groundwater.

OID’s own studies show a consistent decline in the local groundwater basin. Coupled with water sales outside the district, the decline would seem to most observers to represent a failure to comply with requirements imposed by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), a new state program designed to prevent the depletion of the state’s rapidly disappearing groundwater.

The most obvious way to address declines in groundwater is by the application of surface water in lieu of pumping. Just outside OID’s boundaries, but still within its sphere of influence, tens of thousands of acres of almond orchards are wholly dependent on groundwater. Most of the owners of those orchards would prefer to buy OID surface water, but the district has thus far preferred to sell outside the region.

OID has responded to court restrictions on water sales in a number of ways, including by temporarily abandoning its own water rights so that the so-called “surplus” water can be sold outside the district. When OID’s most recent attempt at a fallowing program ran into the brick wall of CEQA requirements, OID went ahead and paid farmers to fallow anyway, even without the compensation of a water sale.

The biggest payout—$331,000— went to OID farmer John Brichetto. Other payouts amounted to additional hundreds of thousands of dollars.

While OID’s water policies may seem complex and labyrinthine to the casual observer, they boil down to a relatively simple principle. The fundamental rule is to provide district farmers with water below the cost of delivery. Without public scrutiny, the simplest way to do so is by selling water to buyers outside the region.

Louis Brichetto, attorney Patrick Soluri, Bob Frobose, City Towers, Modesto

But given public scrutiny, OID’s programs reveal a fundamental violation of the public trust. By selling local water outside the region, OID is hurting the common interest in favor of subsidizing a few farmers, many of them very wealthy. The subsidies—really just payouts in some cases—result in favorable votes for those OID board members who support water sales. It’s a circle of payouts and vote-buying much like one might see in a banana republic.

In this latest case of rebuke by the court of appeals, OID is required to pay not only its own court costs, but those of the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance. The total will almost certainly be well over half a million dollars. Coupled with payouts for a fallowing program that was never court-approved, OID has paid a few powerful farmers millions of dollars strictly on the basis of their wealth and power. That’s not a public institution, it’s an oligarchy. OID Board members Doornenbal, DeBoer, and Orvis have a lot to answer for.

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: Gail Altieri, Linda Santos Oakdale Irrigation District, Oakdale Irrigation District Fallowing Program, Oakdale Irrigation District water sales

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Damon Woods says

    November 28, 2018 at 8:22 pm

    I sure hope OID learns a lesson.

    Reply
  2. Portugal says

    January 26, 2020 at 12:35 am

    In the process, the board will have to answer a fundamental question: how much water do Californians need and how much should be left for endangered fish?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

?Monster Fracks? Are Getting Far Bigger. And Far Thirstier.
“Monster Fracks” Are Getting Far Bigger. And Far Thirstier.
A Times analysis shows that increasingly complex oil and gas wells now require astonishing volumes of water to fracture the bedrock and release fossil fuels, threatening America’s fragile aquifers.
www.nytimes.com
Newsom urges SCOTUS to consider encampment ruling that has 'paralyzed' California cities
Newsom urges SCOTUS to consider encampment ruling that has ‘paralyzed’ California cities
The Democratic governor’s intervention lays down a mark in a legal dispute with potentially profound implications for one of California’s most pressing issues.
www.politico.com
Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events
Clarence Thomas Secretly Participated in Koch Network Donor Events
Thomas has attended at least two Koch donor summits, putting him in the extraordinary position of having helped a political network that has brought multiple cases before the Supreme Court.
www.propublica.org
How hungry is California? Millions struggle to eat well in an abundant state
How hungry is California? Millions struggle to eat well in an abundant state
How bad is hunger in California? A lot depends on your access to food aid, which expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic but now is being reduced.
calmatters.org
Sacramento DA sues city over homeless encampments
Sacramento DA sues city over homeless encampments
Sacramento County had nearly 9,300 homeless people in 2022, based on data from the annual Point in Time count. That was up 67% from 2019. Roughly three-quarters of the county’s homeless population….
www.mercurynews.com
At Last, a Real Possibility to Avoid Catastrophic Climate Change
At Last, a Real Possibility to Avoid Catastrophic Climate Change
After decades of minimal action, Congress passed the largest and most comprehensive piece of climate legislation in U.S. history. Will we make the most of this opportunity?
www.audubon.org
How the fentanyl crisis' fourth wave has hit every corner of the US
How the fentanyl crisis’ fourth wave has hit every corner of the US
The epidemic’s staggering scale and infiltration of communities is laid bare in a new study.
www.bbc.com
Can licensed tent villages ease California's homelessness epidemic? This nonprofit thinks so
Can licensed tent villages ease California’s homelessness epidemic? This nonprofit thinks so
Taking people off the street and into tents is a new twist on homeless shelter being explored by the San Francisco-based Urban Alchemy in two tent villages operating in Los Angeles and Culver City.
www.latimes.com
Mississippi has problems, but it's handling homelessness better than L.A.
Mississippi has problems, but it’s handling homelessness better than L.A.
The public tends to blame homelessness on poverty, drug use, crime or even warm weather. But other cities don’t have L.A. levels of street homelessness because they have more available housing.
www.latimes.com
Neo-Nazis March Through Florida Park
Neo-Nazis March Through Florida Park
The demonstrators raised “Heil Hitler” salutes and waved flags with swastikas.
www.thedailybeast.com
Families have high hopes for Gavin Newsom's CARE Courts. Providers want to lower expectations
Families have high hopes for Gavin Newsom’s CARE Courts. Providers want to lower expectations
Gov. Gavin Newsom?s experiment to push Californians with mental illness off the streets and into treatment, CARE Court, starts soon.
calmatters.org
Pope says 'backward' U.S. conservatives have replaced faith with ideology
Pope says ‘backward’ U.S. conservatives have replaced faith with ideology
Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the U.S. Catholic Church. He says they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.
apnews.com

Find us on Facebook

pp
The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design