• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

Asphalt Empire Rises

March 29, 2015 By Eric Caine 8 Comments

Dave Lopez
Dave Lopez

The two best economic indicators last week weren’t in the business section of your daily newspaper. Instead, they came in the form of a political announcement and a little-noticed vote by one of the most obscure committees in county government.

The political announcement was Dave Lopez’s formal declaration he would run for Mayor of Modesto against incumbent Garrad Marsh. Citing his opposition to Marsh’s proposal for an increase in the sales tax, Lopez said he would manage the city more like former Mayor Jim Ridenour.

The vote occurred at the March 25 meeting of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) for Stanislaus County. One of the best kept secrets in the state, LAFCo is charged with “discouraging sprawl” and approving jurisdictional boundaries and spheres of influence for the county’s cities.

In many counties, LAFCo fails to fulfill its function mostly because the public has little awareness of existence. That was the case in Stanislaus County until the election of Supervisor Jim DeMartini. A staunch proponent of farmland preservation, DeMartini became an active member of LAFCo’s governing committee and now serves as chair.

Though DeMartini has provided the energy and oversight to assure that LAFCo serves its mission, there are never-ending attempts to stack the commission with pro-growth members. That’s what happened recently when Brad Hawn and Amy Bublak were appointed.

Last Wednesday, Bublak and Hawn supported a drastic reduction in developers’ fees for farmland mitigation. The proposal to reduce fees lost by one vote; DeMartini and fellow Supervisor Terry Withrow voted to maintain the current fee structure.

So what do the LAFCo vote and Dave Lopez’s announcement have to do with the economy? Both are signs local developers are ramping up for another growth boom.

Garrad Marsh has a stellar record for supporting mitigation for loss of farmland. When the Modesto City Council voted in favor of reducing developers’ fees for mitigation, only Marsh and Councilmember Jenny Kenoyer voted against the reduction. Dave Lopez joined all the other councilmembers in supporting reduced fees.

During recessions, developers show little interest in local politics. When the economy heats up, they try to maximize opportunity and profits by putting their supporters in office.

Dave Lopez hopes to gin up enough anti-tax hysteria to unseat Marsh. He could also siphon votes from Marsh in a crowded race. Crowded races are among developers’ favored strategies for winning local elections because they often result in run-off elections. Run-offs tend to neutralize the incumbent’s advantage.

Developers are already confident they have enough votes on the Modesto City Council. With a replacement for Marsh, they could direct city growth policies for the next eight years. They could also keep putting pressure on LAFCo to become more growth-friendly.

The economy is heating up and developers are moving to spur another growth boom. Voters beware: When the economy improves, the Asphalt Empire rises. The consequences are sprawl, stressed social services and infrastructure, and long recessions.

 

Filed Under: Featured, Politics Tagged With: Dave Lopez for Mayor, Stanislaus County LAFCO, Supervisor Jim DeMartini

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. West Sider says

    April 1, 2015 at 7:32 pm

    Eric,

    Great that you posted about the LAFCO meeting. I don’t believe what you posted is accurate though. I don’t believe there was a vote to ” lower fees “. LAFCO’s mitigation policy is a work in process. I believe what happened was LAFCO’s policy did not have a set mitigation figure. Patterson has been toying with an Ag mitigation policy for some time. Not because the city recognizes the importance of preserving ag land. They don’t. They are forced to come up with a plan if they want to annex any land, and that is the only reason they did so. What happened was the BIA came up with a figure of $2,000 an acre for mitigation an city just accepted it. Can you imagine adopting a figure from the BIA? That is the fox guarding the hen house. Not surprising since developers have dictated Patterson’s planning for years. It was Patterson’s ridiculous adoption of the BIA’s suggestion that drove LAFCO to look into the fees. Keep in mind that an ag mitigation fee is not required by LAFCO, It is one of several options cities can use as plan to preserve farmland. Newman did something else. Their plan will be ineffectual, but that is another story

    Reply
  2. Tom Orvis says

    April 1, 2015 at 11:37 pm

    Hughson has a 2:1 policy and Oakdale has a 1:1. I have a long history with this from San Joaquin County where I was involved with the creation of the County’s Ag Mitigation policy and Stockton’s as well. Both values were based on NEXUS studies which no city in Stanislaus County is willing to pay for. Both numbers were in excess of $8,000 per acre. The $2,000 number is coming from the Sierra Club settlement with Manteca, Lathrop and Tracy.

    Here’s a link from Eric Parfrey of the Sierra Club Chapter in Stockton synopsizing the San Joaquin policies. Eric coincidentally is the lead planner in Yolo County and the only other county to have the LAFCO determination Stanislaus County has. It’s not a coincidence.

    http://toolkit.valleyblueprint.org/sites/default/files/01_agricultural-programs-san-joaquin-county_eric-parfrey_2009_0.pdf

    I understand Oakdale & Hughson’s objections. Maybe if the other cities adopted something plausible the County would not react this way. Call this the Patterson Rule. The key was to provide a framework and let the developer (experts in land acquisition) and the landowner make a deal. If not, and at last resort, let the Farmland Trust make an acquisition. They are accredited and experts in doing this – they are also well aware of the price tag it takes to get this done. It sure is not $2000 per acre. If it has water, it is only becoming more valuable.

    Just my opinion.

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      April 1, 2015 at 11:49 pm

      Thank you Tom and Westsider. It is a pleasure to have such alert and knowledgeable readers. We started The Valley Citizen in hopes of having readers like you add to our knowledge and understand and we always appreciate when you do. I recently heard of irrigated farmland selling for $27,000 an acre. $2,000 is risible.

      Reply
      • west sider says

        April 2, 2015 at 7:35 pm

        Under mitigation, they wouldn’t have to actually purchase the land, just the rights to develop it by placing an easement. On the westside in areas where there are good water rights, open land can fetch $30,000 per acre, and more if the land is planted with trees. From what I’ve seen land in the Modesto and Turlock areas are at least that.

        Reply
  3. west sider says

    April 2, 2015 at 7:30 pm

    Interesting from Tom’s email where that $2,000 came from. I believe the BIA provided that figure to the City of Patterson. I have to commend the City of Hughson. They appear to recognize the value of farmland preservation, and was proactive in setting up a plan. Newman’s quickly adopted a plan also, but I believe what they adopted is pretty useless. Patterson doesn’t want to adopt anything that would actually work, they just want rapid growth and urbanization. The developers call the shots there.

    Reply
  4. Tom Orvis says

    April 5, 2015 at 4:13 pm

    And now the Cities want to boot out Beekman and reverse the vote. Well then the people should boot out the public representative – he is controlled by the cities – seems fair to me. I worked with him attempting to get Modesto an ag mitigation program. Adamantly opposed. Up comes the Trojan Horse to go low on fees and send it to Ag education. That’s always the carrot and it does nothing. Just an offramp to nowhere but it looks like they care about the future. They used it in Riverbank too on the Sustainable Ag Solutions Committee they created. It was a Trojan Horse too.

    Eric – dig into the connection of the Deputy City Attorney for all six cities and his connections – I think you will appreciate it.

    http://www.modbee.com/news/local/article17417261.html
    .

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      April 6, 2015 at 5:28 pm

      Thank you Tom. Hard to figure why these small towns prefer to ditch unique character and local history in favor of housing tracts and strip malls, especially when residential expansion doesn’t pencil out (except for the guys pulling the political strings).

      Reply
    • west sider says

      April 6, 2015 at 10:18 pm

      “That’s always the carrot and it does nothing. Just an offramp to nowhere but it looks like they care about the future”

      Exactly. That is what I’ve always said. These mayors and their developer allies don’t want an ag mitigation program that might actually work. They want to pass something that won’t work so that everyone walks away feeling good but then it is on to business as usual. And yes Mayor Molina, you and the other six mayors are WRONG. What these mayors are seeking by delaying the vote and seeking to comprimise is to water down the policy to make it ineffective. In regards to the Mayors’ attack on Beekman, LAFCO is an independent state created agency, It was created to ensure Ag mitigation resourses are preserved and cities promote orderly growth. LAFCO was ceated because it was recognized that city’s weren’t achieving these goals on there own. if LAFCO bows down to these mayors, it no longer has any independence. Mr Beekman deserves to be commended. And Mayor Molina, your city is the worst offender of them all. They have done just about everything contrary to the goals established by LAFCO.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter Captcha Here : *

Reload Image

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
“Over the last 72 hours, I have received multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from Christians saying the nastiest and most vulgar things I have ever heard toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward, sellout, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed out at least 500 times.”
www.courant.com
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
thehill.com
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
“Words alone are not enough.” Corporate moves to halt political funding and decry the forces behind the Jan. 6 riot have accelerated a broader movement in business to address social and political issues.
www.wsj.com
I've hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
I’ve hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
After last week the label seems not just acceptable, but necessary.
www.newsweek.com
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Republican leaders’ split on impeachment presages a bigger battle over Trump and the GOP.
www.politico.com
Beaten, sprayed with mace and hit with stun guns: police describe injuries to dozens of officers during assault on U.S. Capitol
Beaten, sprayed with mace and hit with stun guns: police describe injuries to dozens of officers during assault on U.S. Capitol
Authorities say many officers face long recovery following riot
www.washingtonpost.com
Trump Authoritarianism Denial Is Over Now
Trump Authoritarianism Denial Is Over Now
Just weeks, ago, conservatives insisted Trump would concede if he lost the election.
nymag.com
Fact check: Men who stormed Capitol identified by Reuters are not undercover Antifa as posts claim
Fact check: Men who stormed Capitol identified by Reuters are not undercover Antifa as posts claim
Social media users have been sharing content online that suggests those who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 were Antifa, not Trump supporters. Many have been using compilations of pictures as purported evidence, but examination of these images shows they do not support…
www.reuters.com
Who Funded the Putsch of January 6, 2021?
Who Funded the Putsch of January 6, 2021?
We must investigate the riots and find out who was behind it, who organized and financed it.
billmoyers.com

Senior Trump Official: “We Were Wrong, He’s a Fascist”

“The legacy of the Trump administration is going to be that the president sparked an insurrection and people died.”
nymag.com
35 times Capitol Police arrested more demonstrators than the 14 insurgents arrested Wednesday
35 times Capitol Police arrested more demonstrators than the 14 insurgents arrested Wednesday
They have arrested more than 3,600 demonstrators since 2016.
www.motherjones.com
Perspective | The pro-Trump media world peddled the lies that fueled the Capitol mob. Fox News led the way.
Perspective | The pro-Trump media world peddled the lies that fueled the Capitol mob. Fox News led the way.
Even today, they are still at it.
www.washingtonpost.com
Joe Scarborough Drops F-Bomb on MSNBC, Calls for Arrest of Donald Trump After Capitol Raid
Joe Scarborough Drops F-Bomb on MSNBC, Calls for Arrest of Donald Trump After Capitol Raid
“If they are not arrested and brought to justice today, then we are no longer a nation of laws and we only tell people they can do this again,”
Morning Joe host says, referring to the…
www.rollingstone.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design