• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

Caltrans Touts Plan for Second Phase of Freeway Project

October 3, 2018 By Bruce Frohman 2 Comments

Bruce Frohman

Caltrans has rolled out a plan to extend the 132 Freeway project from Dakota to Gates Roads with an advertisement in the Modesto Bee. Caltrans will hold an event before the November election to get public comments on the new phase.

In order for the new phase to proceed, voters must reject Proposition 6 in November. The proposition would repeal the 12 cent per gallon gasoline tax enacted in 2017 by the California State Legislature.

If the 12 cent per gallon tax is repealed, the newest phase of the 132 Freeway project would be killed for lack of funding, along with hundreds of other projects started but not completed statewide.

The timing of the introduction of the newest phase, just before the election, is no accident. Caltrans knows that many citizens in Stanislaus County want the freeway built, so the proposal is bait to defeat Proposition 6.

The Arguments in Favor of Proposition 6

Two basic arguments have been put forth in favor of Proposition 6. One argues that tax money presently collected is sufficient to build and maintain roads. The second claims Caltrans should be abolished due to wasteful expenditures of taxpayer money.

The first argument holds no water. Insufficient tax money is collected to build new roads and maintain existing ones. In the mid 1990’s, the Citizens’ Advisory Committee of the Stanislaus Council of Governments (then called the Stanislaus Area Association of Governments) was told by the County Public Works department that a 25 cent per gallon tax increase was needed just to maintain existing roads.

The 12 cents per gallon to be repealed by Proposition 6 is about half of the tax increase needed over 20 years ago. Thus, passage of Proposition 6 would increase the maintenance deficit and result in worse roads.

On the other hand, the contention that Caltrans wastes large amounts of taxpayer money holds a dam full of water. Tax revenue would be better spent if given directly to the counties.

The grievances against Cal trans are many; following are a few blatant examples.

The administrative cost for Caltrans projects has ballooned from 10 percent in the 1960s to over 25 percent today. Cost overruns are chronic; the Bay Bridge fiasco is a classic.

Highway 132

Caltrans projects waste too much land, which costs money to buy. Drive Freeway 99 between Madera and Merced. Compare the amount of land the old road used next to the railroad with the freeway project recently completed. Every freeway in the Central Valley built in the last 20 years eats up much more farmland than necessary for safety.

Instead of mitigating toxic waste dumps, Caltrans paves over them, disregarding future environmental consequences. Remediation of the dumps will be much more expensive in the future.

Caltrans does not exist to mitigate traffic congestion, only to build roads. As a result, congestion choke points exist by design throughout the state, wasting millions of gallons of gasoline and millions of hours of drivers’ time annually. As planned, the newest phase of the 132 freeway project will create a choke point at Gates Road.

Metering lights can reduce the need to add lanes to freeways; Caltrans ignores less expensive alternatives to added lane construction. Where metering lights are installed, they often are not turned on when they would be useful.

Proposition 6 is a loser for taxpayers no matter which way they vote. If Proposition 6 is passed, roads will deteriorate. If it is defeated, a dysfunctional agency will get more money to waste. Elected leaders don’t show any inclination to eliminate mediocrity.

Fallout From Higher Gas Tax:  Oil Company Profiteering

Whenever California raises gasoline taxes, oil companies raise the price of gasoline more than the amount of the tax. When the legislature raised the gasoline tax by 12 cents per gallon, the oil companies immediately raised the price of gasoline by only 12 cents per gallon—while everyone was watching.

This past summer, the price of gasoline kept rising and is higher now than it was in the summer. In past years, gasoline prices dropped after Labor Day. Not this year.

Driving from California to Wyoming, one will notice at least a $1 per gallon difference in gasoline price. The spread is larger than in past years by more than the 12 cent per gallon new tax.

Citizens are getting cheated from all directions and will lose no matter how they vote. Best to buy an electric vehicle until the state figures out how to tax them.

 

Filed Under: Environment

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gary Barton says

    October 3, 2018 at 6:03 pm

    “The first argument (tax money presently collected is sufficient to build and maintain roads) holds no water. Insufficient tax money is collected to build new roads and maintain existing ones.”

    Yeah, sure. CA is the 2nd highest fuel taxed state in the nation (thank you, PA!). And if the 12 cent/ga tax is repealed? Wow, we’d fall all the way to 6th. Amazing that 44 other states plus DC can figure out how to build and maintain roads, but California can’t even consider doing it for less than the current 55 cents/ga. Well, either that, or the Left (read – the Party in power in CA) simply wants more and more and more of our money to fund their bloated bureaucracies and union cronies. And in the eyes of all good Libs, every gov’t program (except defense and police) known to man receives “insufficient funds.”

    Guffaw.

    Reply
  2. Bruce Frohman says

    October 8, 2018 at 4:52 pm

    Mr. Barton’s assertion that enough tax money is generated by gas tax revenue alone is inaccurate. As cars have become more fuel efficient, gas tax revenue growth has not matched the increased cost to build and maintain roads. Some gas tax money has been diverted to other modes of transportation in order to remove traffic from roads, thereby benefitting roads indirectly.
    The article made the case that Caltrans plays a role in funding shortages through its inefficiencies. However, even if the agency were run perfectly, inadequate funding would still exist as the cost to build new roads in California is generally higher than other states due to higher costs for land, labor, and materials. The cost to rebuild a road is much higher than to repave. Unfortunately, many roads in California need to be rebuilt due to inadequate maintenance under Republican and Democratic administrations.

    To blame the funding shortfall on liberals or conservatives is dishonest and divisive. The argument reflects negatively on the writer of such tripe.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Trump forces seek primary revenge on GOP impeachment backers
Trump forces seek primary revenge on GOP impeachment backers
Candidates, donors and local party officials are already organizing against the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump.
www.politico.com
McCarthy Falsely Denies Voting To Overturn Election Results
McCarthy Falsely Denies Voting To Overturn Election Results
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Thursday denied that he, in fact, voted to overturn the election results as…
talkingpointsmemo.com
Audubon Files Lawsuit to Protect Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Audubon Files Lawsuit to Protect Migratory Bird Treaty Act
A coalition of conservation groups is going to court to overturn Trump Administration’s weakening of the landmark bird protection law.
www.audubon.org
Californians scramble for shots amid slow vaccine rollout | CalMatters
Californians scramble for shots amid slow vaccine rollout | CalMatters
Gov. Newsom said the feds failed to deliver promised vaccine supplies, but he expects Californians with their first shots to be able to secure their second.
calmatters.org
David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
“Over the last 72 hours, I have received multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from Christians saying the nastiest and most vulgar things I have ever heard toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward, sellout, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed out at least 500 times.”
www.courant.com
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
thehill.com
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
“Words alone are not enough.” Corporate moves to halt political funding and decry the forces behind the Jan. 6 riot have accelerated a broader movement in business to address social and political issues.
www.wsj.com
I've hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
I’ve hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
After last week the label seems not just acceptable, but necessary.
www.newsweek.com
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Republican leaders’ split on impeachment presages a bigger battle over Trump and the GOP.
www.politico.com
Beaten, sprayed with mace and hit with stun guns: police describe injuries to dozens of officers during assault on U.S. Capitol
Beaten, sprayed with mace and hit with stun guns: police describe injuries to dozens of officers during assault on U.S. Capitol
Authorities say many officers face long recovery following riot
www.washingtonpost.com
Trump Authoritarianism Denial Is Over Now
Trump Authoritarianism Denial Is Over Now
Just weeks, ago, conservatives insisted Trump would concede if he lost the election.
nymag.com
Fact check: Men who stormed Capitol identified by Reuters are not undercover Antifa as posts claim
Fact check: Men who stormed Capitol identified by Reuters are not undercover Antifa as posts claim
Social media users have been sharing content online that suggests those who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 were Antifa, not Trump supporters. Many have been using compilations of pictures as purported evidence, but examination of these images shows they do not support…
www.reuters.com
Who Funded the Putsch of January 6, 2021?
Who Funded the Putsch of January 6, 2021?
We must investigate the riots and find out who was behind it, who organized and financed it.
billmoyers.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design