• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

Can the MID Justify Water Subsidies for Farmers?

November 22, 2014 By Bruce Frohman Leave a Comment

Worth a Subsidy?
Worth a Subsidy?

The Modesto Irrigation District (MID) is contemplating rate increases for water and electricity customers. The proposal has raised ire about below market water rates for local farmers. City dwellers argue that they should not have to pay higher rates as long as farmers receive water at subsidized rates.

Any time a government entity provides a subsidy, three possible reasons explain it. First, the subsidy may exist to promote an activity for the public good. Second, the recipient may simply receive a sweetheart deal. Finally and most likely, the government entity may not have accurately figured the cost of the service or product, inadvertently granting a subsidy.

Critics of the MID water rate structure allege that farmers receive a sweetheart deal as a reward for agrarian predecessors building the system in the 1880s. MID has provided water and electricity that have made possible the urbanization of large areas of Stanislaus County. Critics maintain that past generosity should have no bearing on the current rate structure.

Possible Justification for Farm Subsidies

Water subsidies for farmers can be justified. Farmers produce an ultimate social good. Their activity produces food that everyone needs to survive. Keeping agriculture healthy and viable serves the public interest. Lower rates promote productivity and prosperity throughout the community.

Historically, farming has not been known for high profits. Over the years, larger farms with better capitalization and more efficient production methods have replaced many of the small farms of the past. As world demand continues to grow, farming has finally become highly profitable. Low irrigation rates helped sustain farmers through tough times.

As in any business, farmers seek the lowest cost for any product or service the business needs for operation. By keeping surface water rates low, pumping groundwater is minimized. Farmers utilize surface water and leave ground water as a reserve for dry years. If water rates rise, ground water consumption will increase. Raising water rates could have a negative impact on MID’s income from sale of water and adversely affect the groundwater reserve.

Why Water Rates are Higher for Cities

Water rates in the cities are necessarily much higher than in farming areas because much more infrastructure is needed to deliver the product. Also, city water has to be sanitized and upgraded for human consumption. Farm water quality standards are lower, reducing the cost of processing and delivery.

Determining Fair Rates

Local hydrologist Vance Kennedy recently cited a 2004 U.S. Geological Survey report to justify water rates that would be lower than those advocated by MID critics. The report stated that an average of 58 percent of water used in flood irrigation eventually works its way into a ground water table. The water can be reused in the future when needed, so why should farmers pay for unused water?

In computing farm water rates, farmers should be given credit for the water their irrigation method saves for future use. If cities recycled their water, they would deserve similar consideration.

Critics complain that flood irrigation wastes water. However, according to Kennedy, the practice recharges groundwater and removes salts from the surface, keeping the soil fertile and productive. Conversely, drip irrigation does not benefit ground water levels and leaves salts on the surface, eventually ruining the soil for farming.

Ultimately, members of the MID Board of Directors are charged with determining what is fair. No one likes to pay more while the other guy receives a subsidy, especially when the perception is that the subsidy is the consequence of a sweetheart deal.

On the other hand, a legitimate subsidy for the good of the community that can be justified by sound reasoning is much more likely to receive a positive reception. Whatever rate structure the MID Board chooses, they will need to do a great job selling it. In times of water shortages, the sales job is much more difficult.

 

Filed Under: Featured, History Tagged With: farm water subsidies, Modesto Irrigation District electricity rates, Modesto Irrigation District water rates

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Housing advocates are about to deliver a message to the Bay Area: Comply with state…
www.sfchronicle.com
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty 'Law of the River' holds sway
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty ‘Law of the River’ holds sway
At the heart of tensions over water allotments from the Colorado River is a complex set of agreements and decrees known as the ‘Law of the River.’
www.latimes.com
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America's largest rainforest
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America’s largest rainforest
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, a focus of political battles over old-growth logging and road-building in forests for decades, has received new protection from the Biden administration.
theconversation.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design