• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

Did the Congressman Take a Bribe? You Be the Judge, by Bruce Frohman

September 9, 2012 By Eric Caine 5 Comments

 

The American Way

Congressman Devin Nunes and Jeff Denham have both signed the Grover Norquist pledge. Both are against restoring the San Joaquin River, a project which would bring thousands of jobs to the San Joaquin Valley. Here, Bruce Frohman explores some of the dire consequences of signing the Norquist pledge.

My Congressman signed a pledge to the Grover Norquist political action organization not to raise taxes under any circumstance. Grover Norquist runs an organization whose sole purpose is to elect candidates who will not raise any taxes—ever. This sounds like a noble purpose to the average taxpayer. No one wants to pay more taxes.

After signing the Norquist pledge not to raise taxes, the Congressman receives large campaign contributions from the Norquist organization for his reelection. His signature on the pledge affects how he votes in Congress. This seems like a bribe because payment is received after a pledge is signed and votes are made demonstrating adherence to the pledge. Before coming to a conclusion as to whether a bribe has been paid, wait to read below “what the law says.”

Grover Norquist refuses to say who funds his organization. He has only acknowledged that his money comes from large corporations. Thus, we don’t know the names of the clients directly benefiting from his political activities. Logically, all of his clients benefit. Otherwise, they wouldn’t fund his organization.

The present tax code enables large corporations to pay a small percentage of their income compared to the average citizen. The tax code is riddled with loopholes that have enabled some corporations to pay as little as zero percent in income tax annually. Large corporations have a vested interest in keeping the tax code exactly as it is written.

When sufficient numbers of members of Congress sign the pledge, Congress can’t repeal tax breaks for any corporation. The corporations that provide the contributions through the Norquist organization directly benefit. Through the Congressmen’s votes, the average middle class citizen loses because he usually pays a larger percentage of his income in taxes than corporations even though his income is much less. Most citizens consider the tax system unfair. Congress is unable to make everyone pay his fair share of taxes due to the pledges to the Norquist organization.

What the Law Says

The law says that campaign contributions are not considered bribery. Therefore, no Congressman who has signed the Norquist pledge has taken a bribe according to the law. However, if the Congressman is re-elected, and the large campaign contribution from Norquist makes his re-election certain, the Congressman indirectly benefits financially from the campaign contributions. The Congressman retains his Congressional salary and speaking fees he derives from continuing to hold his position.

The result is comparable to bribery. The unnamed corporate contributors to the Norquist organization benefit from the votes and the Congressman benefits from being reelected with the help of campaign contributions.

Some might refer to the process of giving money through the Norquist organization as money laundering. The giver is hidden from the receiver. The receiver declares that he is ignorant about who his benefactors are and who his votes are favoring. Intent to take a bribe cannot be proven.

How a Campaign Contribution Becomes a Bribe

If a Congressman uses campaign money for personal expenses, he will be prosecuted for misuse of campaign funds. The personal use of campaign funds would provide a direct link between the Norquist organization donations and the financial benefit of the Congressman, a key element of bribery.

The law says that a prosecutor must prove intent in order to establish the existence of a bribe. Was the pledge signed with the expectation of future campaign money from Grover Norquist’s organization? Probably. But the pledge document does not promise a reward for signing the pledge and campaign donations cannot be considered bribery, so intent to bribe or accept a bribe can’t be established.

Operating in the Grey Area of the Law

Acts that are legal but have the appearance of being unethical should not be tolerated by voters. We should not vote for politicians who engage in questionable activity, period. Thanks to the construct of the law, politicians can operate within a large grey area that allows them to engage in dubious practices without fear of legal consequences.

In the main, the public is not well served by politicians who operate within the grey area of the law. When any elected official communicates in advance how he will vote, he does a disservice to his constituents and the nation as a whole. He is no longer gathering all the facts and making the best possible decision with the facts at hand at the time the decision needs to be made. Instead, he has pre-decided the decision and is not free to use his best judgment.

When the Pledge Could Be Most Detrimental

Suppose we enter into another war or have a national emergency? The pledge prevents the expenditure of additional funds without increasing the federal deficit. Taxes can’t be raised to fund an emergency. This policy guarantees the eventual bankruptcy of the nation. We are almost always at war and now the nation has no way to pay for it.

Given the need for government services and a lack of ability to raise revenue, how can the national debt ever be repaid ? Contrary to the assertions of Norquist’s defenders, budget cuts alone will not result in the repayment of the national debt. Tax cuts usually do not increase tax revenue.

Any Congressman or elected official who signs a pledge committing his or her future votes should be voted out of office or removed, period. Regardless of whether an act is considered a bribe, an elected official who cannot vote based on the best interests of his constituents should not hold office.

 

Filed Under: Featured, Politics Tagged With: Denham Norquist tax pledge, Grover Norquist, Jeff Denham, Jeff Denham tax pledge

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Taxpayertoo says

    September 10, 2012 at 3:41 am

    I agree wholeheartedly!
    Accountability to constituents…..that is an elected official’s primary responsiblity.

    Reply
  2. Fred Herman says

    September 14, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    Denham is an unmitigated disaster, a tragedy for the middle class American. Luckily we have so exemplary a candidate in Jose Hernandez. This election is a smaller version of the presidential election, good trying to stem the tide if evil, How a thinking person can still consider voting Republican is a mystery to me.

    Reply
  3. Kent Mitchell says

    September 19, 2012 at 3:12 am

    Excellent point, Bruce, about the negative aspects of the Norquist tax pledge. Not only does the pledge cover tax increases, it also applies to any temporary decrease in taxes that is about to expire or any attempt to eliminate a tax deduction or loophole. Norquist threatens those not signing the pledge to back opposing candidates who do. This has many GOP legislators running scared, afraid to stand up to Norquist and his bullying tactics.

    As mentioned, the result has been a squelching of flexibility during budget negotiations, when most Americans desire compromise in order to solve financial problems. I sense lately Norquist and his group losing some steam. Even some GOP legislators like Lindsey Graham have spoken out against signing such a pledge.

    BTW, Bruce, also thought your letter to the editor regarding Social Security was well written and on the mark.

    Reply
  4. USWatlarge says

    November 18, 2012 at 4:55 am

    Bruce, your on the money trail! Big money must be taken out of our government, today we have the best or worst money can buy you may say….depends on whether your on the receiving end or not! Republicans are bringing in the cash from these Norquist money laundrying bribing contracts of aligiance. What would our forefathers have done? Would they have challenged Grover to a duel, caught him alone sometime or taken the money too? Americans must wake up to the idea that rape is rape and the same applys to bribery,is bribery . Heed my warning, republicans need to burst the bubble they are in and make dire changes before it is too late !!

    Reply
  5. David Adalian says

    November 30, 2012 at 7:51 pm

    I agree with the evils of the pledge.

    But a small point bothers me. You have assumed incorrectly that Congress has the authority to define the meaning of the English word “bribe”. That is obviously incorrect.

    Congress has the authority to define what conduct constitutes a punishable offense. But the English word “bribe” retains its prior meaning regardless of the Congressional action.

    I don’t have an opinion whether there has been a bribe. But there are two independent meanings by which that can be judged. There can be conduct which constitutes a bribe within the common understanding of the meaning of that term which is nonetheless not a punishable offense.

    I suspect that many “political contributions” are in fact “bribes” within the common meaning of the term. When the miscreant gets to define the offense that is exactly the result one would expect.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Trump made 30,573 false or misleading claims as president. Nearly half came in his final year.
Trump made 30,573 false or misleading claims as president. Nearly half came in his final year.
The Washington Post Fact Checker’s database of Trump claims, originally launched as a project to track his first 100 days, offers a window into his obsessions.
www.washingtonpost.com
The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News
The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News
Falsehoods almost always beat out the truth on Twitter, penetrating further, faster, and deeper into the social network than accurate information.
www.theatlantic.com
Could a homegrown coronavirus strain be partly to blame for California's surge?
Could a homegrown coronavirus strain be partly to blame for California’s surge?
California scientists have discovered a new coronavirus strain that appears to be propagating faster than any other variant in the Golden State.
www.latimes.com
The Worst President in History
The Worst President in History
Three particular failures secure Trump’s status as the worst chief executive ever to hold the office.
www.theatlantic.com
Trump forces seek primary revenge on GOP impeachment backers
Trump forces seek primary revenge on GOP impeachment backers
Candidates, donors and local party officials are already organizing against the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump.
www.politico.com
McCarthy Falsely Denies Voting To Overturn Election Results
McCarthy Falsely Denies Voting To Overturn Election Results
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Thursday denied that he, in fact, voted to overturn the election results as…
talkingpointsmemo.com
Audubon Files Lawsuit to Protect Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Audubon Files Lawsuit to Protect Migratory Bird Treaty Act
A coalition of conservation groups is going to court to overturn Trump Administration’s weakening of the landmark bird protection law.
www.audubon.org
Californians scramble for shots amid slow vaccine rollout | CalMatters
Californians scramble for shots amid slow vaccine rollout | CalMatters
Gov. Newsom said the feds failed to deliver promised vaccine supplies, but he expects Californians with their first shots to be able to secure their second.
calmatters.org
David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
David Brooks column: Trump ignites a war within the church
“Over the last 72 hours, I have received multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from Christians saying the nastiest and most vulgar things I have ever heard toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward, sellout, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed out at least 500 times.”
www.courant.com
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
Here are the companies suspending political contributions following the Capitol riots
thehill.com
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
How the Capitol Riot Thrust Big American Companies Deeper Into Politics
“Words alone are not enough.” Corporate moves to halt political funding and decry the forces behind the Jan. 6 riot have accelerated a broader movement in business to address social and political issues.
www.wsj.com
I've hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
I’ve hesitated to call Donald Trump a fascist. Until now | Opinion
After last week the label seems not just acceptable, but necessary.
www.newsweek.com
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Cheney-McCarthy rift busts open
The Republican leaders’ split on impeachment presages a bigger battle over Trump and the GOP.
www.politico.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design