• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

History, Water, and Devin Nunes

June 23, 2015 By Eric Caine 4 Comments

Congressman Devin Nunes
Congressman Devin Nunes

To hear Congressman Devin Nunes tell it, politics and litigation are tools used solely by radical environmentalists to further their goals of depopulating the San Joaquin Valley. Nunes just published an extended diatribe arguing that “the Natural Resources Defense Council and several other environmentalist groups” are engaged in a plot to remove 1.3 million acres of San Joaquin Valley farmland from production.

In what has become a recurring theme for Nunes and other political leaders who carry water for corporate agriculture, Nunes claimed today’s drought is for the most part man-made:

“From my experience representing California’s agricultural heartland, I know that our water crisis is not an unfortunate natural occurrence; it is the intended result of a long-term campaign waged by radical environmentalists who resorted to political pressure as well as profuse lawsuits.”

Bizarre as Nunes’ claims may seem to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of the Valley’s natural and political history, his views too often represent a dominant San Joaquin Valley narrative.

In fact, as early as the late nineteenth century, vast expanses in and around what is today Nunes’ 22nd District were already under the control of corporate agriculture. By the 1880s, James Ben Ali Haggin, “the Grand Khan of the Kern,” had increased his San Joaquin Valley holdings to 375,000 acres.

Like Haggin, famed cattlemen Henry Miller and Charles Lux operated out of San Francisco. They controlled over 120,000 acres. Also like Haggin, their properties extended through Tulare and Kern Counties, and north and west into Merced County and beyond.

Haggin’s story, and the stories of Lux and Miller, can be found in David Igler’s Industrial Cowboys: Miller and Lux and the Transformation of the Far West 1850-1920. The book is indispensable for anyone who wishes to understand the political history of land and water use in the San Joaquin Valley.

According to Igler, Haggin, Lux, and Miller realized early on that politics (also known as “political pressure”) was as important to acquisition of vast tracts of land as capital. As early as 1868, Miller and Lux hired Horace Higley, “to lobby for passage of the Green Act, which removed all acreage limitations on the amount of school and swampland an individual could claim.”

Higley was a former head of the California State Land Office and thus well-positioned to achieve the ends of his corporate employers. Once vast acreage of so-called “swampland” had been obtained at cut rates, landowners could “reclaim” it by draining wetlands and diverting water for irrigation.

Then as now, water was the critical element that transformed vast tracts of almost worthless land into empires of profit and power. And then as now, disputes about water were settled in the courts.

The landmark case, Lux v. Haggin (1881-86), featured the two corporate giants of San Joaquin Valley agriculture in a bitter legal battle that would establish precedents for water rights for years to come. And once precedents for water rights had been established, so was the rule that only the extremely well-financed and well-connected could challenge those rights.

And while Devin Nunes may argue that today’s drought is man-made, drought was as punishing a natural force to the San Joaquin Valley in the nineteenth century as it is today. After the dry winter of 1877, Henry Miller could find no grass for his and Lux’s cattle. They lost almost 10,000 head to starvation that year.

Ironically, part of Lux and Miller’s losses came as the results of water diversions from the Kern River. The diversions had been made by their corporate competitor, James Haggins.

Drought, politics, and litigation have thus been integral factors in San Joaquin Valley history almost since the first settlers. However, it’s only been in the last few decades that politics and litigation have become tools for others than the Valley’s corporate giants.

When growing demands for water exhausted the Kern and San Joaquin Rivers, corporate agriculture looked north and began tapping Sacramento River water via the San Joaquin Delta. But diversions from the Sacramento River soon threatened the ecosystem of the entire Delta, including fisheries and Delta farms. Nonetheless, the political and financial power amassed over more than a hundred years enabled corporate agriculture to appropriate ever more water from the north.

By the 1980s, a growing awareness of the detrimental effects of diminishing water supplies forced the people of California to begin contemplating revisions in California water law. As California’s citizens became more aware of the depleted state of their rivers and wetlands, they began realizing the need for public engagement in arguments over public resources. That engagement, both political and legal, was effected through the environmental groups Nunes has seen fit to demonize in his latest screed.

The current drought forced the state to establish groundwater regulation for the first time in its history. According to Nunes, the groundwater law is also a plot against Valley citizens:

“But these pumping restrictions, slated to take effect over the next decade, will reduce access to what has become the final water source for many Valley communities, which have increasingly turned to groundwater pumping as their surface water supplies were drastically cut.”

Pretending that San Joaquin Valley residents have suddenly been forced to resort to groundwater may be the most outrageous of Nunes’ long litany of egregious assertions. Just adjacent to Nunes’ District boundary, Fresno, the Valley’s largest city, has pumped most of its water from the ground since its founding.

In fact, much of Nunes’ district is in or near the largest known area of land subsidence in the world. The subsidence is the result of overdrafting groundwater; the overdrafting occurred long before the state established groundwater regulation and even long before Devin Nunes was born.

Nunes himself is only among the latest in a long line of Valley politicians who’ve chosen to further the interests of corporate agriculture at the expense of the public trust. Outraged that ordinary citizens have found ways to compete with corporate powers through politics and the courts system, Nunes has chosen inflammatory propaganda as yet another tool to maintain and extend corporate dominance in the San Joaquin Valley.

Unfortunately for Nunes, new media have made it easier for citizens to access the truth about private appropriation of public resources through political machinations. The kind of lobbying that enabled corporate giants like Lux and Miller ready access to Sacramento and Washington D.C. still goes on, but citizens today are finding it easier to track.

So when Johnny Amaral, Devin Nunes’ long-time chief of staff, is hired to lobby for Westlands Water District, the news spreads rapidly, first among water news insiders, then to the general public. And no one has to wonder how it is that Westlands, despite having very junior water rights, manages to wield so much political power in California’s water wars.

After all, the $250,000 salary Westlands will pay Amaral is but a small portion of the district’s annual political expense. Westlands paid four different firms $730,000 to lobby in Washington D.C. last year, and employs another firm to lobby in Sacramento.

Nonetheless, don’t expect Devin Nunes to stop hyperventilating about environmental groups using politics and litigation on behalf of the public interest. As far as Nunes and his corporate friends are concerned, politics and the courts should continue their long history of exclusive service for the rich and powerful. Anything else, says Nunes, “will lead to the collapse of modern civilization in the San Joaquin Valley.”

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. OtPR says

    June 23, 2015 at 4:53 pm

    I was much surprised by Nunes’ editorial. I don’t see things his way but it was the most coherent piece I’ve ever seen from him. It was actually a cohesive argument with supporting evidence and he didn’t spin off into calling anyone a Wiccan. He has been refining his worldview or he got a good editor or something.

    I added up the costs of Westlands’ management one time, came to about $3/acre. They are willing to pay for their political power, that’s for sure.
    http://onthepublicrecord.org/2011/08/02/meant-to-write-about-this-earlier/

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      June 23, 2015 at 6:50 pm

      I’ve seen these claims many times in almost the same words. They are based on two false assumptions: One, there is simply not enough water for all those people and trees UNLESS water is taken from other uses. Two, the courts and political system belong as much to the people as they do to private enterprise, despite the resentment of private enterprise and its political water carriers.

      Reply
  2. West Sider says

    July 2, 2015 at 8:50 pm

    Eric,

    There is some truth in what Devin Nunes is saying. There is segment of radical environmentalists that want to shut down farming completelyin some areas. In the past, I have spoken to an attorney that represents one of the water districts. This person told me the attorney had spent years working with the government trying to come up with a solution that would satisy everyone regarding the Delta operations. Whenever they come close to an agreement on a proposed solution, this band of environmentalists object threatening legal action. They don’t want a solution.

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      July 3, 2015 at 1:32 pm

      Hello West Sider. Always nice to hear from you. I agree there are people who want to shut down farming just as there are people who want to drain every drop from the rivers and ruin the Delta. There are also those who have realized there simply isn’t enough water for everyone. When I oppose the Oakdale Irrigation District proposal to sell water to Westlands Water District, I could be accused of trying to end farming on the West Side. Actually, I’m in favor of preserving farming in Stanislaus County. I’m also in favor of farming in the Delta. There’s simply not enough water to go around, and we are having to make hard choices. I favor sustainable farming, living rivers, and a healthy Delta. They are hard choices.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Housing advocates are about to deliver a message to the Bay Area: Comply with state…
www.sfchronicle.com
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty 'Law of the River' holds sway
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty ‘Law of the River’ holds sway
At the heart of tensions over water allotments from the Colorado River is a complex set of agreements and decrees known as the ‘Law of the River.’
www.latimes.com
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America's largest rainforest
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America’s largest rainforest
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, a focus of political battles over old-growth logging and road-building in forests for decades, has received new protection from the Biden administration.
theconversation.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design