Two days before last Christmas, Mary was sitting on the curb at the intersection of Morris and Sycamore, scratching lottery tickets. Alan Davis, the wheel-chair bound amputee, had once again bolted from the new county shelter in the Berberian Building on Modesto’s south 9th Street. He was downtown on J Street, between 11th and 12th Streets, eating a sandwich from the nearby Subway Shop. A block or so away, across from the county courthouse on I Street, a naked man was singing loudly and scrubbing himself down with what looked like a small sponge.
Just a little east, on Downey near 5 Points, Michael was stepping on and off the curb, shouting curses at passing cars; his mother Theresa was likely nearby, her shopping cart overflowing with the usual collection of blankets, edibles, and other things she deemed necessary for life on the streets. A bit north and west, Channon was pushing and pulling a long train of scavenged junk, piled high on a remarkable assortment of wheeled carts and carriers.
Just a few weeks earlier, at least four of these six homeless people could be located at the Modesto Outdoor Emergency Shelter (MOES), which had been shut down when local authorities opened the new 182-bed shelter in late November. MOES had provided tents for over four-hundred people. When it closed, those who didn’t get into the new facility spilled back into their familiar haunts on the streets, in the parks, and along the rivers.
As we come to the end of January this year, after over five years of the Stanislaus County’s “Focus on Prevention” program for homelessness, it looks to many observers like there are as many or more homeless people outside as ever.
Modesto and Stanislaus County aren’t alone in trying to stem the rising tide of homelessness; west coast cities from San Diego to Seattle are seeing the same steady increases in numbers. Though many people are still calling homelessness a choice, authorities are finally recognizing that the combination of fixed incomes and rising prices, especially escalating housing costs, has had inevitable results.
In fact, more and more homeless people are on disability, and many more are likely qualified. But typical disability incomes amount to around $1,000 a month, nowhere near enough to afford housing in a market that for years has been on an elevator with no signs of a top floor.
“I’m on disability,” said a homeless man named Eric just recently. “I can’t find housing anywhere. They want first and last month’s rent, plus the rent’s almost as much as my total payment. How am I supposed to afford that?”
In addition to the effects of skyrocketing housing costs on people with fixed incomes, no one yet has found a satisfactory solution to the problem of homeless people who are mentally ill. Estimates of the number of mentally ill people in the homeless population range from twenty-five to forty-five percent.
Given these crushing realities, and given also there are too few or no alternatives for people in the bind of fixed incomes and rising costs—as well as those with diminished mental capacities—no one should expect anything other than growing numbers of people with nowhere to go.
Last year, Bob Erlenbusch, a board member for the National Coalition to End Homelessness, estimated that sheltering homeless people at MOES resulted in a cost of $13 per day. The total cost to shelter over 400 people for a little over 10 months was $1.6 million. In contrast, the 182-bed shelter is expected to cost approximately $3 million per year; that’s in addition to the costs of remodeling portions of the Berberian Building to accommodate more beds, showers, and laundry facilities. MOES sheltered over twice as many people for a little more than half the cost.
Most city and county budgets statewide are already stretched close to or even beyond reasonable limits—there’s little or no money for homeless shelter and services. On January 8, Governor Gavin Newsom allocated over $1 billion for homelessness, including money for physical and behavioral health services. He’s also offered tents and trailers, but they will likely be in limited supply. The money will provide a tremendous benefit for people experiencing homelessness, but even that amount won’t bring about near-term remedies for shortages in affordable housing.
In the meantime, it’s looking to many observers like Modesto’s experiment with MOES may have offered the best and most economical alternative to people on the streets, in the parks, along the rivers, behind the buildings, along the canals, in the alleys, and in their vans and cars. It may be time to bring back the tents, especially since there’s ample room in a parking lot near the Berberian Building and at the adjacent terminus of 10th Street.
Great story Eric. Just wanted to add that MOES would have sheltered even more people but expansion was thwarted because of a lack of resources; thus, a referral from law enforcement was required that kept additional entrants to a minimum. The same thing happened at Beard Brook; it ran out of room!
I think it’s fair to say from what I’ve observed that the holdouts from going into any type of shelter were people that have social anxiety issues and the true hard core folks who choose to be homeless and left alone in remote areas. My guess is that these folks are around 3% of homeless population which would be about 40 in Modesto.
Putting donated free tents from the State in the areas you suggested would be ideal in that it would make it easy for people to transition from tents into one of the shelters next door as well as get services at the co-located Access Center!!
That is true for those I know personally.
Homeless shelter programs can either serve the homeless or enrich those who provide the service. Most government programs enrich the providers and are not cost effective.
Modesto has found a cost effective means of providing temporary shelter in the tents, plus a more expensive ineffective program in the Berberian shelter.
Japan’s solution is to build very small units that are inexpensive to build and low cost to maintain.
The Modesto area has always had homeless since the founding of the City. No matter what is done, a few homeless will remain. But the problem can be minimized through constant attention, effort, and cost effective initiatives.
Thank you Valley Citizen for keeping the problem in the social conscience.
Bruce the shelter at 9th and D should have been expanded when I established it. The then Business manager for S.A. lied to me and Didn’t expand to what it needed to be. That was 19 years ago and homelessness increases. How does a temporary anything help chronic homelessness?
I would live to see a break down of costs for the 1.6 million spent on MOES. They were provided with just abbot everything they needed from outside sources, donated. Besides fencing and what little security was provided I don’t see the cost. Not to mention where did the 7.. million dollars go that was awarded to theCity of Modesto by the state to combat homelessness? Seems like these people aren’t getting what was given, just a tiny percentage. So WHERES THE REST OF THE MONEY???
There were countless County, City and Non Profit staff at the MOES site daily. Staff included Modesto Police, Fire Department, Animal Control, Behavioral Health and Alcohol and Drug. I’m sure there were others but. these are the staff I am aware of.
When MOES closed I was the first one to sleep there on 10st. For a few days but the cops told me I had to leave or go to jail and they would take my furbabys to the pound. But even if I had stayed there’s no room in the shelter for me I was to far down on the list
But I was afraid to lose my baby’s so begged a friend of my brother’s to let me put a tent in his yard. I pay him each as I am on disability, I do have income but it is only $800.00 a month. So I would like to know how to rent a place on that. But I have three furbabys one of them is my ESA .
I know this is late coming. Just discovered this article. I have something to add. Better late than never…
I attended meetings, here in Modesto, a few years back, the focus was on “homelessness”. I was all fired up, in a positive way, to think people were interested in putting heads together to tackle a problem that needed a remedy. I was not the only one pleased to hear of the meetings.
I used to meet and serve food, and toiletries, to a regular group of homeless individuals on the street next to the public library, immediately after the farmer’s market would pack up and leave, on Saturdays. They, too, were excited to think things would soon be better for them. They spoke about monies having been donated to their cause, to actually do something, for a change.
After attending regular meetings around town, and meeting some sincere people from different local churches and agencies, I still became less and less invested, as I could see things were going no where fast. People would split up into various titled groups, committees, etcetera, yet, time was going by and by and by, BUT, nothing much was really coming together.
I stepped out of those meetings, never to return, about the time when certain officials were going to start researching what other cities around the nations were doing with their homeless populations. Those efforts were more than likely in earnest but the sheer amount of time it was going to swallow up was more than I had patience for. I am not good at twiddling my fingers or wasting time in going nowhere committees.
I found it sad, literally, sad, to hear some individuals remark, around the tables at the meetings, about how surprised they were to have finally, actually, spoke to a homeless person. Going on to remark about how they were more real than they had originally thought. God, and, only the persons who were sharing such thoughts, knew what the original thoughts had been, previously, before having discovered the realness of the homeless person they met.
Those meetings were going at a snails pace like hundreds of homeless people were not waiting on us to come through for them, immediately, if not sooner…
How far removed from the homeless does one have to be to be surprised they are real live human beings, just like you and me? How did we ever get so caught up in our own little worlds, feathering our own little nests, that we could distance ourselves, so far removed, that we could lose sight of the fact that those, enduring homelessness, are truly no different than ourselves.
I heard it said, more and more often, that the average person is no more than one or two paychecks away from teetering on homelessness. Or that mental illness affects all walks of life. That due to the rising cost of housing, whether preventable, as brought on by greediness, or not, far too many households are shelling out, on average, approximately 50% of their earnings, or more, trying to keep a roof over their heads.
That was prior to Covid-19, and all the economic hardship that comes with that…
Anyways, in the meantime, and I do mean MEAN TIMES, time goes on, freezing, or near freezing, cold winters, blistering hot summers, and all these years later, Modesto, Stanislaus County, Valley Citizens, are no closer to truly remedying the plight of most of those homeless. Those not choosing to be homeless are the majority.
As for the millions of dollars thus far spent, on the homeless, via MOES, and other experiments, it appears alot of those earmarked dollars are paying for peripheral services, that are paid for under different columns of funding, not under homelessness, per se, or not provided at all, when the homeless are living off on their own around the city. Are we sure the homeless need so much staff once huddled together somewhere.
What I am getting at is that there exist other groups of homeless people, in other locales, who are self-monitoring. A good percentage of those who have become homeless are fully capable of a meritocratic lifestyle where if they were provided with a hand up, so to speak, some land, building supplies, or, tiny inexpensive safe housing, for example, a sizeable share of the homeless would become, much more, if not entirely, self-sufficient. Many hold down jobs, or have fixed incomes and have previously not had to be babysat, essentially. Pretty expensive sitters I might add.
Why do we not trust them to live in intentional communities, self governing? Why do we continue seeing only the worst in people, just because they had the misfortune of becoming homeless? It is costing them and tax payers a steep price to paint the entire homeless population with a single wide brush.
I could go on for hours, coming up with valuable ideas, about valid ways to better treat the homeless, yet I did not get the impression that those people, then, were ready to hear what I had to offer. After all, how can any group of people solve such a legitimate problem as homelessness, by only dedicating a few hours per week to generating worthwhile goals, then implementing those projects into fruition?
I came away with the perspective that many of those present at the meetings really only wanted their parks back, from the homeless, and unrealistically thought some overly simplistic answer would surface, that they could simply snap their fingers at, then, call the solution done…
“There but by the grace of God go I”, is a very self-centered expression. God mandates that WE love our neighbors as ourselves, even those WE do not want in our back yards (NIMBY). WE are made to be gregarious, not ALOOF!
I ask for your forgiveness for having spoken about homeless individuals or groups, in a manner that seems pejorative, when I mean no such harm…