Homeless: “It’s different these days.”

Many believe today’s system of care and recovery for homeless people is antiquated and inadequate. For the most part, they’re right. Nevertheless, some people just need an intervention and chance to get back on their feet, especially those with income and a place to go. Efren Torres is one such person.

Efren Torres
Efren Torres

Efren Torres had been clean for three years when he lost his wife in a tragic automobile accident in 2015. He’s sixty-four years old.

“That’s when I started using again,” he says. “It’s one thing when someone is fighting cancer and you kind of know what to expect. But when the coroner calls and tells you your wife is dead and you’ve been thinking she’ll be home soon, it’s really rough.”

At the time, Torres, though he was born in El Paso, Texas, had spent most of his life in the Bay Area.

“We lived in San Leandro. I was really a product of the sixties. We used all kinds of drugs. We’d take LSD and go to the Fillmore Auditorium. Later, when the AIDS epidemic began, I got really scared because many times people shared needles. But I was lucky. I never even went to the hospital except one time for a hernia.”

Torres says one difference between young people today and those in his time is work.

“I always worked. I worked twenty-two years for Georgia-Pacific. We made paper, huge rolls of it, and other things. I also worked for another company as a lab tech. My father was a Teamster and I was a Teamster. We both made good money. In those days we had factory jobs. You don’t have factory jobs these days.”

Even though he did two prison terms for drug related crimes, Torres says he could get hired because people knew he was a good worker. “I could walk down one street in those days and fill out three job applications. And I could get someone who knew me to speak up for me.”

Torres says he’s used almost every drug possible, but methamphetamine was what he used most often when working. “Lots of people who worked used meth, especially truck drivers. But I was always scared to miss work. I was even scared to be late. So the meth didn’t keep me from working, and that’s why I have an income now. I have a pension and SSI.”

Torres lost his Bay Area residence after his wife died and he went back on drugs.

“It got so I couldn’t afford to live in the Bay Area any longer, so my daughter told me to come to the Valley. I got to Modesto and I saw that arch and I remembered it from all the Scott Peterson stories. Then I found a nice place I could afford on Fresno Avenue on the west side.”

But drug use was once again Torres’ downfall.

“I was using and started letting too many people in. The landlord told me he didn’t like the situation, and he evicted me. I don’t really blame him.”

It’s not uncommon for drug users who have income and lodging to attract predators, grifters, and couch surfers. Even though Torres had used drugs most of his life, jobs and family had kept him in the mainstream. Even his prison sentences hadn’t condemned him to permanent exile. But once evicted, he found he couldn’t find another place to live.

Efren Torres

“Even though I had income, people would say they didn’t want to take a chance on me because I had been evicted. And some places found out I had a record, and they really wouldn’t rent to me. I was shocked. I just had never been in such a situation. This has been a real humbling experience.”

One of the few places that would take Torres was the notorious Budgetel (formerly the Vagabond Inn), on McHenry Avenue in Modesto.

“It was named the ‘Budgetel,’ but everyone still called it the Vagabond. I really felt bad there. Black tar heroin was everywhere, especially around the young people. I felt so bad for them and tried to talk to them, but I was using heroin myself. It got really bad.”

Torres found himself on the streets even before the Budgetel was shut down by order of the City of Modesto.

“I was sleeping behind buildings on McHenry Avenue or next to friends with camps alongside the freeway even though I had income. It just happened all at once.”

Torres was beginning to think he had no way out when he got a break from an outreach worker who put him in a county-maintained halfway house.

“I was telling my story and the next thing I know people are praying for me. They got me over to the Modesto Gospel Mission and Chaplain Steve got me into a program. I didn’t sleep for six days and nights. It was really hard but I kicked heroin. Chaplain Steve really got me into the right place.”

Because he has income, Torres is able to work with the local Housing Authority. He’s certain he’ll have a permanent place to live soon.

“They’re really organized. They’ve got all my information, and they’re going to find a place that will take me. I should be on my own soon.”

Unlike many homeless people, Torres never lost any of his identification. He’s got his Social Security Card, Driver’s License, and other ID. He’s got sufficient income to afford housing. His situation, difficult as it is, is far easier to address than the problems of the vast number of homeless people staying on the streets or at Modesto’s Outdoor Emergency Shelter (MOES).

Modesto Gospel Mission
Modesto Gospel Mission

“I was shocked when I came here (MOES) to visit a friend,” said Torres. “This can’t be a permanent situation. A lot of people here aren’t going to get better. There’s a lot of mental health problems. I see people fighting their personal demons. They need their meds. You can tell just by watching them.”

Torres says that even when he was in prison, he always tried to steer younger people in the right direction.

“I’d see the younger guys strutting around, lifting weights and trying to be tough, and I’d tell them that the really tough guy is the one who makes it outside. I knew most didn’t listen, but I thought if I got through to just one guy, maybe it would make a difference.”

Torres says he’s always worried about younger people, and he’s proud his daughter has succeeded with a good education and Master’s Degree.

“It’s different these days,” he says. “We came out of the sixties and we used drugs, but we could work. I always felt good when I had a job and could work hard and make good money. It made me feel good. It’s different these days.”

Eric Caine
Eric Caine
Eric Caine formerly taught in the Humanities Department at Merced College. He was an original Community Columnist at the Modesto Bee, and wrote for The Bee for over twelve years.
Comments should be no more than 350 words. Comments may be edited for correctness, clarity, and civility.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Our elected leaders should do some math.
    First, tally up all expenses to provide temporary housing to the homeless. Include the grant to the Salvation Army. Include the cost of tents under the ninth street bridge, clean up, port-o-potties, social services and police services. Second, divide the total expenditures by the number in the population served.
    You will find that the total expenditures exceed the per person cost to rent houses and apartments for the population served if each unit rented is fully occupied at capacity–even at the current high rents being charged.
    A large percentage of the homeless population should be eligible for Supplemental Security Income or other federal benefit. That income increases resources further above current need.
    Throwing money at a problem rather than finding the most cost effective way of delivering service never solves the problem.

    • Bruce you make some good points about getting a handle on the costs of the way the homeless system is currently managed. A couple of other factors come into play which make the situation even more complex: 1) Many of these folks can’t just go into housing as they need continuing support services which are costly, so it’s not just the cost of housing and 2) SSI is only available to very few of the homeless, not a large number. And those who are eligible, only get about $950 a month, which won’t pay the rent anymore!

  2. We’re pleased to see a happy ending is in sight for Mr. Torres. But it goes to show how society stigmatizes drug users, many of whom are taken advantage of (as in this case) and how a simple “hand up” versus a “handout” can be the most successful approach in many cases That said, drug addiction is a disease, one that kills many victims each year no matter their education or income level. Sadly, much of that is due to street drugs where the buyer doesn’t know what they’re getting nor the strength or even the type of the product. Other times it’s due to over-prescribing of pain medications without properly weaning the patient off the treatment program by tapered usage, often sending some folks to the street on their own in search of more medication..

    We have often looked back in history to before drug use was blackballed and have found many biographies of very successful people with great minds and talent, that have, despite personal drug use, contributed greatly to society and earned their own way in the world.

    So what has changed in this day and age? Harsher drug laws, fines and imprisonment, with not much in the way of treatment programs has been what we’ve seen over the past four decades. There arrive enormous bills in the mail on being released from either jail or prison with little evidence of change in the inmate, save for that pile of court fees, legal bills, etc …. all of which were supplied to the defendant “free” at the time of need, but presented as a bill once released without intervention, training, or rehabilitation and who, due to the impending garnishment of wages by the County or State, soon find locating a job that will hire them difficult and holding one when it’s found often more so. .

    We think the money used to deal with drug enforcement laws and both the homeless and the drug using population could be better spent in an effort toward giving these folks that all-important “hand up.”

    Homelessness alone is burdensome and often deadly itself, with or without drug use. Both are also costly to the community and often just a temporary patch is applied by local government. There definitely needs to be another approach. We concur with Mr. Frohman’s comments, particularly with respect to the cost-per-person being thrown at the problem being in excess of what a decent living space would run. Things need to be changed as what is currently being done is certainly not working very well.

Comments are closed.