• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

Is the MID Taxing Customers Illegally with the “Falling Water Charge”?

October 12, 2012 By Eric Caine 2 Comments

 

Falling Water?

Just when it looked like things couldn’t get any worse for the Modesto Irrigation District (MID), the heavens opened and delivered a world of trouble in falling water.

In the arcane parlance of irrigation districts, “falling water” is water that falls from dams and spillways to provide electricity. Some districts impose on their customers a “Falling Water Charge.” The Falling Water Charge is an attempt to capture the value of the falling water and then pass it on as a cost to customers of the district.

The Falling Water Charge as imposed by the MID features two important elements: (1) The Falling Water Charge is hidden in customers’ electrical bills; most customers are not aware of its amount and purpose, and (2) even though the Falling Water charge is paid by MID electrical customers, it is used to cover operational expenses for the district’s Irrigation Division. Thus, MID customers, most unknowingly, subsidize Irrigation Division customers.

On November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, also known as, “The Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative.”  One of the consequences of Proposition 26 was to shine a light on practices like the Falling Water Charge. The key issue is whether or not such charges constitute an illegal tax under the definition established by Proposition 26.

Several criteria are used to determine whether or not a fee or charge is in reality a tax as defined by the new law. One key element requires the local government entity, the MID in this case, to show that the fee or charge is not in excess of the amount required for the activity used to justify the charge. Since the Falling Water Charge provides revenue to the Irrigation Division of the MID, MID will have to show how the Charge applies to irrigation costs and whether or not it exceeds those costs.

Costs associated with the Falling Water Charge fluctuate wildly. According to an internal MID memo, they were as high as $10,158,720 and as low as $2,268,371 between 1996 and 2011. The reason for the wide gap between the two figures is doubtless readily available, but now MID will have to offer a public explanation.

Moreover, if a court were to rule the Falling Water Charge is indeed an illegal tax, the MID would lose an important source of revenue. Since the MID has significant financial deficits, the loss of revenue would be a major blow, especially coming after the defeat of a water sale which would have helped the MID begin to recover from some of its losses.

The Falling Water Charge has been in effect since 1995. Once it becomes public knowledge, there are bound to be some angry rate payers. And angry rate payers may be the best the MID can hope for, because if the MID must give up Falling Water Charge revenue, the alternative is higher rates and even more outrage and public scrutiny. For an institution that’s just endured months of scathing public criticism, the prospect of even more to come can’t be appealing.

All in all, MID Directors and management seem in for yet another round of storm and discord, and it’s hard to see how they can emerge with anything but more problems. Next: The Memo From Hell

Filed Under: Featured, History Tagged With: Falling Water Charge, MID Falling Water Charge, Modesto Irrigation District

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Eric Reimer says

    October 12, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    It seems appropriate that the MID cease subsidies of the Irrigation Div. by the Electric Div.; even Directee Wild (whose area of representation contains the majority of the electric customers) is on record as opposing subsidies.

    Would the irrigation users pay more? Of course. Unfair? Not at all.
    In the Oct 2012 MID bill insert there is to be found this statement
    “MID is a not-for-profit organization. All charges are based on cost of service, not making a profit.”

    There is a caveat; historically the MID established electric service as a means of reducing the cost of irrigation water, and if a transfer is to continue in any amount, it must be a clearly stated budget line item, voted on by the Board in open session, and shown as an individual charge on electric bills.

    Reply
  2. Chris Gulick says

    October 12, 2012 at 6:53 pm

    Having faithfully paid my MID bill for the entire time this subsidy has been imposed I can imagine any number of customers would be outraged and looking for a refund or perhaps a class action lawsuit.
    I doubt MID’s actions are an isolated incident and serve to further illustrate how disfunctional irrigation districts can become.
    Perhaps a thorough independent audit would be in order ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Housing advocates are about to deliver a message to the Bay Area: Comply with state…
www.sfchronicle.com
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty 'Law of the River' holds sway
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty ‘Law of the River’ holds sway
At the heart of tensions over water allotments from the Colorado River is a complex set of agreements and decrees known as the ‘Law of the River.’
www.latimes.com
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America's largest rainforest
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America’s largest rainforest
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, a focus of political battles over old-growth logging and road-building in forests for decades, has received new protection from the Biden administration.
theconversation.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design