Jeff Denham’s True (Water) Colors

“Ha, ha! Fooled you again!”

Assistant Secretary of Interior David Bernhardt doesn’t get much attention. He probably likes it that way. If more people knew about his previous job as a high-priced lobbyist for Westlands Water District, there might be more publicity about his attempts to influence California water policy.

As it is, the people getting credit for the Trump administration’s western water policy are Jeff Denham, David Valadao, Devin Nunes and Kevin McCarthy, all from the San Joaquin Valley. Jeff Denham is the only one of these representatives from a district that consistently claims to have “surplus water,” even during droughts and the imminent threat of a state “water grab.”

The Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) routinely sells its “surplus” water outside the region, and its best customer by far is Westlands Water District, recently also one of David Bernhardt’s best customers. Westlands Water District has no real water rights. Instead, it has contractual rights based on availability of water during wet years; these rights are known among water insiders as “paper water” because they have no basis in history and are subject to any number of contingencies, including drought, dry years, endangered species, and competitive bidding.

Recently, OID has had trouble selling its water because of lawsuits brought forward by the Oakdale Groundwater Association (OGA) challenging OID’s failure to account for the effects of its water sales on the region’s groundwater levels. Over the last twenty years or so, tens of thousands of acres of almond and walnut orchards have been planted in the foothills, just outside OID boundaries. The trees are almost solely dependent on groundwater and are draining the last great aquifer in the San Joaquin Valley.

California’s new groundwater rules require local authorities to achieve groundwater sustainability within twenty years. Local water districts must also show signs they are working to achieve sustainability. When a local judge ruled against OID in its case against the OGA, he added that OGA had provided a public service by bringing the suit.

The judge recognized that protecting our groundwater isn’t just a matter of law, it’s a civic duty, especially given the imminent threat of climate change. Water itself is a public resource that has become commodified and thus subject to exploitation.

Consider, for example, farmers within the Oakdale Irrigation District. They get water at ridiculously low rates beginning at $4 an acre foot—far below the cost of delivery. Meanwhile, water rates for urban users are skyrocketing.

The low rates for Oakdale farmers are subsidized by water sales far outside the district— mostly to Westlands—even though farmers within the OID’s sphere of influence are willing to pay rates high enough to pay not only for the water but also the cost of delivery. Anyone curious about OID’s refusals to deliver water locally need only remember the basic answer to most all questions involving water: Follow the money.

Westlands Water District may not have sound water rights, but it does have some of the finest lobbyists and politicians money can buy. It also benefits from the Central Valley Project, a New Deal program that at the time was routinely described as a “subsidy.” The idea was to deliver water from the northern part of the state to farmers in the arid region of the southern San Joaquin Valley. The project was initially intended for small farms— no larger than 160 acres—but that limit was soon superseded.

Today, politicians in the southern San Joaquin Valley are on a constant hunt for water. Since they have few to no true water rights, they have to get water through political machinations. One of the latest was an attempt to prevent litigation against the Delta Twin Tunnels and the California Water Fix. The Delta Tunnels and the California Water Fix are intended to make it easier to send northern California south, including water from the Oakdale Irrigation District.

Jeff Denham has not only supported legislation to prohibit lawsuits against the tunnels and Water Fix, he’s also supported new legislation to fast track water deliveries to the southern San Joaquin Valley. Denham has said water sent through the San Joaquin Delta doesn’t affect his district, when in fact OID water sales are delivered via the Delta.

Recent announcements by the Trump administration that the “Central Valley” will receive more water are the result of Assistant Secretary of Interior David Bernhardt’s continued lobbying efforts for Westlands Water District, aided and abetted by Jeff Denham, David Valadao, Devin Nunes, and Kevin McCarthy.

Some of Jeff Denham’s biggest local donors also favor sending water south. They include Oakdale farmer John Brichetto, a recipient of subsidized water, Sacramento resident Tim O’Laughlin, the Oakdale water attorney, and nurseryman John Duarte, who sells thousands of nut trees to southern San Joaquin Valley farmers. Stewart Resnick, who owns 180,000 acres of nut trees in Kern County, is also one of Jeff Denham’s biggest contributors, even though he lives in Beverly Hills.

Jeff Denham has touted the recent headlines and fanfare about the Trump administration’s proposals to fast track water deliveries through the Delta as a victory for his district. In fact, if the proposals were to succeed, all they would result in is higher demands for local water. Meanwhile, our water is threatened both by the state water grab and ongoing depletion of our aquifers.

Jeff Denham’s true colors on water have been hidden by a grandstanding appearance at the Sacramento water rally and repeated assertions about protecting “Central Valley” water. In fact, like David Bernhardt, Jeff Denham is committed to carrying water for Westlands Water District because that’s where the money is and that’s what his partners in congress want him to do. It’s that simple.

 

 

 

Eric Caine
Eric Caine
Eric Caine formerly taught in the Humanities Department at Merced College. He was an original Community Columnist at the Modesto Bee, and wrote for The Bee for over twelve years.
Comments should be no more than 350 words. Comments may be edited for correctness, clarity, and civility.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Modesto residents have been under outdoor watering restrictions for over 20 years.
    We live in an area with a water surplus? We can afford to sell our water out of the area while being denied the right to use what we want?
    Mr. Caine is spot on with his “follow the money” analysis. Money corrupts. A lot of money is involved in the taking of our water. Mr. Caine has identified the biggest players in the corruption. Everything the players do is “legal”, but Morally corrupt. Public water is being monetized for the personal gain of high rollers. The politicians involved should not be rewarded by voters. Unfortunately, politicians are able to lie with impunity by raising phony issues, lying about their records, and hiding their misdeeds. They claim tribal leadership despite being illegitimate and sew the seeds of social divide.
    If the people of District 10 don’t wise up soon, the area will be economically gutted.
    Water is your most important resource. Without it, cities and farms dry up and die.

  2. Can you get this printed by The Bee? If only Valley Citizen subscribers read this, it’s like preaching to the choir. When I saw the front page photo of Denham, Trump, et. al. touting their marvelous water deal for the Central Valleys I thought two things: 1) we’ll never see the benefit locally and 2) this will be a unsubstantiated blow to Harder’s campaign. Not enough people care about the real “deals”, but it should still go into The Bee. .

    • Anita: I wrote for the Bee for almost 13 years. This is the kind of thing they routinely rejected. Different regime then, and we have many readers who aren’t yet decided on all the issues. I encourage people to share things they like; that’s how we keep getting new readers. The more we grow, the more we can do to attract more readers. We’ve been growing fast lately, mostly due to shares.

  3. Really nice work.

    You mentioned that “…the basic answer to most all questions involving water: Follow the money.” How else can anyone explain why we ship a thousand pounds of water, at great expense, to far away areas so we can grow a hundred pounds of cheap lettuce. It has to be money, because otherwise it makes no sense.

Comments are closed.