• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

LAFCo Policy More Complicated than Bee Article Implies, by Scott Calkins

October 1, 2012 By Eric Caine Leave a Comment

 

Scott Calkins

Last Wednesday’s LAFCo decision to require mitigation for encroachment onto ag land met with wide approval, but Scott Calkins has an insider’s view that might temper the celebration. No one denies the decision was a big step forward, but parts of the policy are cause for real concern. Here’s Scott with the inside story.

I attended the LAFCo meeting on September 26, 2012 and read the article that appeared in the Modesto Bee the following day written by Garth Stapley. My impression of the article is that it gives an inaccurate account of what unfolded at the meeting by omitting some import comments made by supporters of farmland preservation, as well as comments made by the alternate members of the commission.

The article also failed to explain why the public member of the Commission, Tia Saletta, cast her vote against a poorly crafted policy that may in the end actually accelerate the loss of prime farmland in Stanislaus County. What follows is my own account of what I saw unfold at LAFCo’s last meeting.

The draft document of the Agricultural Preservation Policy was introduced by LAFCO staff who described it as having a “menu of options” which would allow cities “flexibility” in how they go about farmland preservation. My concern upon hearing how the policy was introduced was that the “flexibility” laid out in the “menu options” creates multiple loopholes that may be so large that the end result of adopting this policy may mean no improvement in the county’s poor record of protecting prime farmland from development. When I was called to speak first during public comment on this agenda item I made it clear that I supported the Commission moving forward to adopt an agricultural preservation policy, but that the “menu of options” appeared to weaken any real effect it may have.

As members of the public made their comments, it became clear that those who favored farmland preservation or conservation also had some reservations about the “menu of options.” Some even went so far as to suggest that if the policy was adopted as presented in the draft so that it might accelerate the loss of prime farmland by allowing cities too much flexibility to sidestep its intent.

I am concerned that the Bee article written by Garth Stapley went too far toward giving the appearance that well-spoken supporters of preserving farmland were giving the policy an unqualified endorsement. In contrast, what I heard from people like Vance Kennedy, Brad Barker, Wayne Zipser, and others was a combination of praise for finally doing something mixed with reservations that this policy may have little or no effect as a result of the loopholes that had been built into the document. Most of the supporters would have preferred a policy that applied a 1:1 ratio of preservation without the “menu of options,” in order that LAFCO might help save something like half of Stanislaus County’s current prime farmland.

After George Petrulakis made a particularly long case that any policy to protect farmland would only invite law suits from land use attorneys like himself, the draft policy went back to the commissioners for some interesting debate. Alternate members like Matthew Beekman , Vito Chiesa, and Ron Freitas, all made strong statements that the draft policy should be cleaned up to eliminate most, if not all of the “menu of options.” They all recognized the importance of 1:1 (acre for acre) mitigation if LAFCO was serious about preserving farmland. In addition, if there was just one method of compliance, LAFCO could avoid arguments between cities about whether some cities were manipulating options like the urban growth boundaries in order to avoid 1:1 mitigation costs.

When the discussion came to the voting members, Commissioner Tia Saletta also favored cleaning up the loopholes to create a policy that had a better chance of actually achieving its goal. Tia Saletta made it clear that she agreed with the arguments being made by the alternate commissioners that the language in the draft was too vague and compliance would be difficult to judge.

Finally, it came time to make a motion on whether to adopt the policy and Chairman Charles Goeken agreed to remove the most vaguely written option from the “menu” of strategies. Then Chairman Goeken insisted that staff include language in the policy that would grant an outright exemption to LAFCO’s Agricultural Preservation Policy for both commercial and industrial development. Chairman Goeken’s argument was that a county with high unemployment could not pass a policy that would make it more difficult to bring jobs to the area.

Commissioner Jim DeMartini made it clear that he would not object to the exemption for conversions of prime farmland for commercial and industrial use. The policy went to a vote with the contentious option of voter-approved urban growth boundaries left in as one of the strategies for compliance. When the role-call vote was taken it was 4 to1, with commissioners Goeken, O’Brien, Bublak, and DeMartini all in favor and commissioner Tia Saletta opposed.

I felt Tia Saletta’s vote took courage and deserved better coverage in the Bee article. Her dissent was based on a desire for a more effective policy with fewer loopholes in order to offer real hope of farmland preservation.

My own conclusion is that LAFCO passed a weak policy that is aimed almost entirely against only one form of sprawl—— residential home construction.

I agree with other supporters of farmland preservation that this policy may be a small step in the right direction; however, the complete exemption of commercial and industrial use has me gravely concerned. Indeed this new policy may cause an acceleration of the loss of prime farmland caused by permits for auto dealerships, big-box distribution centers and a smorgasbord of other commercial/industrial users that have helped to pave over farmland in Southern California and the Bay Area.

On an increasingly crowded and hungry planet where will my children grow the food for the next generation? It is time to begin thinking more long term about what true economic sustainability looks like for California and the nation. I want future generations to have access to healthy, affordable, locally grown food like the kind currently being produced by Stanislaus County’s creative and productive farming community. LAFCo has more work to do in order to insure this policy will achieve its main purpose. In addition, I look forward to more complete coverage of this complicated subject in future Bee articles.

 

Filed Under: Featured, History Tagged With: Scott Calkins, Stanislaus LAFCo, Stanislaus LAFCo farmland policy, Stanislaus LAFCo mitigation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Warren: Voters Must Elect Dems In Midterms Who Would Nix Filibuster To Codify Roe
Warren: Voters Must Elect Dems In Midterms Who Would Nix Filibuster To Codify Roe
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on Sunday said she views the midterm elections…
talkingpointsmemo.com
A Farmer’s Quest to Beat California’s Waves of Drought and Deluge
A Farmer’s Quest to Beat California’s Waves of Drought and Deluge
Don Cameron went all in on a trickle-down survival tactic. It could help save America’s agricultural heartland—even if he doesn’t survive the new water war.
www.wired.com
Ten Ways Billionaires Avoid Taxes On An Epic Scale
Ten Ways Billionaires Avoid Taxes On An Epic Scale
This article first appeared at ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative…
talkingpointsmemo.com
A South Texan?s Wild, Life-affirming Quest to Break a National Birding Record
A South Texan’s Wild, Life-affirming Quest to Break a National Birding Record
When she began her year-long bird-spotting adventure, Tiffany Kersten was lost and lonely. She ended up achieving a major milestone and finding her way.
www.texasmonthly.com
Ron Johnson tried to hand fake elector info to Mike Pence on Jan. 6, panel reveals
Ron Johnson tried to hand fake elector info to Mike Pence on Jan. 6, panel reveals
A top aide said the Wisconsin Republican senator wanted to give Pence the list of pro-Trump electors as he prepared to certify the 2020 election.
www.politico.com
Raffensperger says he wishes Fox News carried every Jan. 6 hearing
Raffensperger says he wishes Fox News carried every Jan. 6 hearing
“I think it would have helped our party heal, given [people] more facts.”
www.axios.com
'Not safe anymore': Portland confronts the limits of its support for homeless services
‘Not safe anymore’: Portland confronts the limits of its support for homeless services
Homeless encampments now spill well beyond Portland’s downtown core, dividing a city that has invested liberally in support services.
www.latimes.com
Republicans Will Do It Again
Republicans Will Do It Again
They have not been chastened by the revelations of the January 6 committee.
nymag.com
Birdman
Birdman
Bird Brother: A Falconer’s Journey and the Healing Power of Wildlife
www.earthisland.org
The Potato Roll Empire Bankrolling Christian Nationalist Doug Mastriano
The Potato Roll Empire Bankrolling Christian Nationalist Doug Mastriano
The Martins were bit players in politics, until they put Doug Mastriano one step away from becoming Pennsylvania’s next governor.
nymag.com
Roger Stone and Michael Flynn under fire over rallies ‘distorting Christianity’
Roger Stone and Michael Flynn under fire over rallies ‘distorting Christianity’
Prominent Christian leaders accuse Trump allies of spreading misinformation about election and Covid, while distorting Christian teachings at ReAwaken America events
www.theguardian.com
Major water cutbacks loom as shrinking Colorado River nears 'moment of reckoning'
Major water cutbacks loom as shrinking Colorado River nears ‘moment of reckoning’
As the Colorado River water shortage worsens, major cutbacks are needed to reduce most perilous risks, a federal official tells senators.
www.latimes.com
Trump Scammed Supporters Out of $250 Million for Nonexistent Fraud Fund
Trump Scammed Supporters Out of $250 Million for Nonexistent Fraud Fund
Supporters who thought they were donating to “election integrity” instead saw some of their money funneled to Trump hotels
www.rollingstone.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design