• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

More Legal Woes for the Irrigation District

April 4, 2016 By Eric Caine 1 Comment

Howard "Chip" Wilkins of Remy, Moose, and Manley
Howard “Chip” Wilkins of Remy, Moose, and Manley

For more than ten years, the Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) has relied on water sales to balance its books. Over the decade prior to 2014, OID water sales brought in well over thirty million dollars.  The bonanza enabled the district to sell water to its customers for well under the cost of delivery.

When OID annexed Trinitas Partners into the district in 2013, the terms of the contract were ballyhooed by management as a great deal for district members because Trinitas was paying so much more per acre foot than OID’s senior customers. But even if every member of the district paid Trinitas’ cost of $55 an acre foot, OID still wouldn’t bring in  enough money to cover OID’s operation and maintenance overhead.

Until recently, OID’s policy of providing water below the cost of delivery was widely popular, especially with district farmers. But the annexation of Trinitas Partners brought heightened concern over such low prices, especially after last year’s decision to cut allocations to the district’s senior members even while delivering water to Trinitas.

The four-year drought added yet another degree of difficulty for out-of-district sales. In recent years, OID has pumped near-record amounts of groundwater. Due to new state groundwater sustainability requirements, it will be much harder to justify sending water out of the district while continuing to pump groundwater.

OID has also had requests from local farmers who’ve asked to be annexed into the district and offered to pay double the price for water paid by Trinitas. As a result, district management is finding it harder and harder to justify selling water to distant buyers.

Until very recently, none of these impediments could have prevented OID management from doing exactly as it wished as long as the OID Board of Directors supported its actions. Things changed drastically last year, when farmer Louis Brichetto threatened a lawsuit if OID pursued its on-farm conservation program as a means of setting water aside for more out-of-district sales. Brichetto’s attorneys argued OID had failed to perform an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

At first, OID management attempted to treat the lawsuit as a frivolous “nuisance,” but when Brichetto refused to back down, OID water attorney Tim O’Laughlin was forced to concede the suit had merit. Last March, at an OID Board meeting, O’Laughlin admitted that OID needed a “full-blown EIR.” He added that if OID failed to follow CEQA requirements, “we will lose” (the lawsuit).

This year, OID planned once again to promote water sales via an on-farm conservation program. Again, OID tried to avoid CEQA requirements by making a “Negative Declaration” for impacts of the on-farm conservation program. And, once again, OID is facing serious legal consequences.

In a March 31 letter of, “Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief,” attorneys for Brichetto, rice farmer Robert Frobose, and the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance charged that OID’s Negative Declaration, “fails to adequately describe the Project; utilizes an improper baseline; fails to adequately analyze impacts to groundwater, air quality, biological resources and energy; and fails to adequately consider cumulative impacts.” In other words, OID needs a, “full-blown EIR.”

Years ago, negative declarations nearly always succeeded in allowing developers, irrigation districts, and others to pursue environmentally sensitive projects without an Environmental Impact Review, mostly because anyone objecting to a project would be forced to hire expensive attorneys in protest. Those supporting pet projects could almost always count on bluffing their way to success because of the exorbitantly high ante to become a player in the land use game.

Despite last year’s hard lesson, OID’s management and a majority of its directors seem unable to realize the game has changed. Even while newly-elected directors Linda Santos and Gail Altieri voiced serious reservations, board members Gary Osmundson, Steve Webb, and Herman Doornenbal voted to proceed with the on-farm conservation project and water sale.

Now the district is faced with the expense of a lawsuit it could very well lose, and, if it loses, it could be required to pay not only its own legal costs but also the expenses of those pursuing the lawsuit—that’s the way CEQA requirements work. Furthermore, loss of the water sale will put OID even further in budget deficit, most likely to the tune of double-digit millions.

Remy, Moose, and Manley, the attorneys for Brichetto, Frobose, and the Oakdale Groundwater Alliance, represent the gold standard for CEQA attorneys state-wide. In fact, they are the authors of the Guide to CEQA, the authoritative guide to the California Environmental Quality Act.

Still, a majority of OID directors seem to think they can bluff their way to success in today’s new water and land use game. They may find that fewer and fewer district members are willing to back their hand, especially when they’re going against players willing to call for a show of cards.

Filed Under: Environment, Featured Tagged With: Oakdale Irrigation District Fallowing Program, Oakdale Irrigation District On Farm Conservation Program, Oakdale Irrigation District water sales

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bruce Frohman says

    April 5, 2016 at 12:06 am

    The information in this article is probably not widely known. Perhaps a number of OID customers are pleased to learn that their rates have been subsidized for ten years. In the short run, they appear to be ahead of the game. In the long run, the depletion of ground water supplies will haunt the district.
    Based on the information in this article, if I lived within the district and my well went dry, I would expect OID to either pay to drill me a deeper well or provide me a discounted supply of surface water.
    As long as OID continues to monetize public water and send it out of the area, those living within the district should expect compensation for damages.
    Another interesting aspect of the water sale is this: if water went to farms outside the district, did the resulting production undermine the value of crops produced locally? As competitive as farmers are, do local farmers like to aid the competition?
    Another compelling question is: could the water have been sold somewhere else for even more money? San Francisco offered MID $700 per acre foot. What has OID been receiving? Was there a bidding process for the “surplus water”?
    So local farmers have to contend with wells going dry, plus aiding the competition. Plus, whether water was sold at market rate is questionable. Suddenly, this “great idea” OID had may be significantly flawed.
    Unfortunately, the general public, including myself, seem unable to justify past decisions that were made. Perhaps OID will treat this comment as an inquiry? Or perhaps citizens living within OID will see this, attend a board meeting, get answers, and post them to the Valley Citizen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Californians: Here's why your housing costs are so high
Californians: Here’s why your housing costs are so high
Half the state’s households struggle to afford the roof over their heads. Here’s what you need to know about one of California’s most vexing issues.
calmatters.org
Las Vegas Pushes to Become First City to Ban Ornamental Grass
Las Vegas Pushes to Become First City to Ban Ornamental Grass
A desert city built on a reputation for excess and indulgence wants to become a model for restraint and conservation with a first-in-the-nation policy banning grass that nobody walks on. Las Vegas-area water officials have spent two decades trying to get people to replace thirsty greenery with desert plants, and now they’re asking the Nevada Legislature to outlaw roughly 40% of the turf that’s left. The Southern Nevada Water Authority estimates there are almost 8 square miles (21 square kilometers) of “nonfunctional turf” in the metro area, grass that no one ever walks on or otherwise uses in
www.voanews.com
Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Half of Republicans believe false accounts of deadly U.S. Capitol riot-Reuters/Ipsos poll
Since the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, former President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have pushed false and misleading accounts to downplay the event that left five dead and scores of others wounded. His supporters appear to have listened.
www.reuters.com
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century
On a leaked conference call, leaders of dark-money groups and an aide to Mitch McConnell expressed frustration with the popularity of the legislation, even among Republican voters.
www.newyorker.com
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
New Zealand raises minimum wage to $20 an hour
Taxes on the richest New Zealanders are being raised
www.independent.co.uk
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
The Invisible Asylum | City Journal
Olympia, Washington, is a microcosm of the problems created by the emptying of mental hospitals.
www.city-journal.org
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
California needs affordable housing. Could these bills help? | CalMatters
Key legislators push duplexes, looser regulations and more money to boost housing supply.
calmatters.org
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let's fix it – here's how | Bernie Sanders
The rich-poor gap in America is obscene. So let’s fix it – here’s how | Bernie Sanders
While working people toil, the richest have never have it so good. It’s time to fight back – our democracy depends on it
www.theguardian.com
Sen. Bernie Sanders' Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A 'Rigged' Tax System
Sen. Bernie Sanders’ Next Progressive Frontier: Reshaping A ‘Rigged’ Tax System
Sanders will introduce legislation Thursday to restore the corporate tax rate to 35% and add a new progressive tax on the estates of the wealthiest Americans.
www.npr.org
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
Perspective | Five myths about poverty
No, it’s not just an inner city problem. And it’s not the result of individual failure.
www.washingtonpost.com
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Los Angeles police clash with protesters in fight to evict major homeless encampment
Echo Park Lake site has become a battleground in the city’s worsening housing and homelessness crisis during the pandemic
www.theguardian.com
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama - The Bulwark
The High Stakes in the Amazon Union Fight in Alabama – The Bulwark
It’s about workplace democracy, and could affect not just the tech giant’s employees but those of other firms.
thebulwark.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design