• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

New Tax for Drivers?

August 8, 2014 By Bruce Frohman Leave a Comment

Your tax dollars at work...
Your tax dollars at work…

News Item: Bloomberg-Businessweek reported this month that the State of Oregon is piloting a new mileage-based tax on automobiles. The purpose of the tax is to augment gas tax revenue that has been declining due to more fuel efficient cars. Oregon is working with ten other western states, including California, to come up with a workable program.

The Pilot Program

Mr. James Whitty is the manager of the Oregon State Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding.  His office has implemented a pilot program consisting of about 5000 participants who have agreed to pay 1.5 cents per mile driven in exchange for a refund of Oregon state gas tax paid at the pump.

The intent of the program is to increase tax revenue in order to fund road improvements and maintenance. As currently configured, the pilot program excludes trucks and other vehicles already subject to special taxes. The pilot program captures new tax revenue from electric vehicles, while increasing revenue from vehicles that use gasoline. The program eliminates the incentive of lower gas taxes for driving high mileage vehicles and the tax free status granted to electric vehicles, but does not affect other incentives in the state and federal tax code. High mileage vehicles still enjoy lower costs of gasoline per mile driven. The program taxes all vehicles by the mile equally, assuming that all non-truck motor vehicles cause the same amount of wear and tear on roadways.

The program does not have any lifeline exclusion for low income drivers or baseline mileage exclusion for those who drive very little.  All participating motor vehicles pay the same tax per mile.

The mechanics of the pilot program are simple. The driver can choose to use a GPS to report miles driven within the State of Oregon or self-report manually. The advantage of GPS is the driver need make no reports to the state and need not apply for a tax refund for miles driven out of state, assuming that the GPS can differentiate between in-state and out-of-state travel. If the driver chooses not to report using a GPS device, then he must manually keep track and report mileage and apply for refund of excess tax paid for miles driven out of state.

Mr. Whitty indicated that a private contractor collects the data and taxes for the program and remits funds to the state. The cost of administration is relatively high for the pilot program. However, the cost per participant will drop below 5% of gross revenue when the program goes state wide, with a participation rate of over one million vehicles. As long as the rules of the tax law are not too complicated, the administration of the program will eventually be cost effective.

California is Looking to Impose the Tax

Mr. Whitty has been providing California officials with information about the pilot program. Each state that decides to impose the tax can set up its own program. Ultimately, lawmakers will have the final say as to the parameters of the new tax law.

When Oregon’s pilot program is successful, Oregon will probably decide to roll it out statewide.  At that point, California is expected to look closely at the results of the pilot program and then decide which aspects of it to adopt. California could decide to adopt all or part of it. Given California’s need for a substantial improvement in highway maintenance and infrastructure, the odds are high that state lawmakers will adopt it, with any number of possible variations.

Depending on how California decides to implement the mileage tax, Valley citizens could be adversely affected to a greater extent than other parts of the state.

Potential Adverse Impacts on the Valley

If California decides to impose the tax from mile one of the drive, low income drivers will be subject to a regressive tax. They will feel the pain the most as they can least afford to pay more taxes. As the Valley has a large population of low income citizens, the economic pain is obvious.

The Valley has a large number of commuters to the Bay Area. Many commuters drive several thousand miles per month. The mileage tax will hit long distance commuters the hardest. If the mileage tax is high enough, the new tax could encourage shorter commutes; that is, working citizens could be forced to move to the Bay Area to cut costs, undermining the local tax base.

Valley citizens who drive high mileage vehicles such as fuel efficient cars, electric hybrids, and all electric vehicles will probably experience a disproportionately greater increase in total annual taxes for roads as they presently pay the lowest levels of fuel taxes; the new tax will level the tax rate for every vehicle.

California presently diverts gas tax money for projects and services other than road maintenance and improvement.  An increase in taxes via the mileage tax will be no guarantee that the Valley will have more money to fix its roads unless the State Legislature writes into the law a provision requiring that all mileage tax collected shall be used for roads in the county in which the tax is collected. Given the legislature’s track record of diversions and disproportionate funding allocations, what is the likelihood of that happening?

 

 

Filed Under: Featured, History Tagged With: California mileage tax, Oregon mileage tax

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Housing advocates are about to deliver a message to the Bay Area: Comply with state…
www.sfchronicle.com
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty 'Law of the River' holds sway
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty ‘Law of the River’ holds sway
At the heart of tensions over water allotments from the Colorado River is a complex set of agreements and decrees known as the ‘Law of the River.’
www.latimes.com
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America's largest rainforest
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America’s largest rainforest
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, a focus of political battles over old-growth logging and road-building in forests for decades, has received new protection from the Biden administration.
theconversation.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design