• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

Reviewing California’s Ballot Propositions: When in Doubt, Vote “No”

September 23, 2020 By Bruce Frohman 1 Comment

Propositions are established via citizen petitions or by order of the State Legislature for an assortment of reasons. Some propositions amend the state constitution, requiring a vote of the citizens. Some proposals intend to undo decisions made by the state legislature or to circumvent the legislative process. Some propositions favor special interests.

There are twelve propositions on the California ballot for the November election. Voters will need to wade through a lot of reading material to fully inform themselves. An excellent non-partisan guide appears at Cal Matters: “Gimme Props 2020 Edition.

When a “No” Vote May be Advisable

Every proposition has drawbacks that may justify a “no” vote. In order to encourage voter approval, propositions contain language touting appealing benefits. Favorable language often appears titles and supporting arguments.

The detrimental part that voters might not notice may be buried at the end of the proposal and may be deliberately omitted in the sales pitch. Proponents know that most voters will not take the time to study all aspects of a measure and hope the bad part is ignored.

Opponents highlight the drawbacks to discourage a favorable vote. Both sides may exaggerate claims, so a third party is needed to fact check.

The impartial report of the Legislative Analyst appearing in the voter handbook informs voters how a proposition will affect the law.  Reading the analysis is essential to understand the proposition. The fiscal impact is a key component of the report.

Propositions can be very difficult to comprehend. If I can’t understand it, I vote “no.” If not all parts of the proposition are acceptable, I vote “no.” Why vote for a poor proposal when a better one can be introduced?

After a cursory review of the 2020 Propositions on the Cal Matters website, I decided to vote “no” on nine of the twelve. For the remaining three, I’ll need more study before I can make an informed decision.

Some voters decide based on who supports or opposes a Proposition.  Unscrupulous proponents and politicians make this method risky.  Sometimes institutional support does not represent the best interests of its members.  Endorsements can be obtained using false pretenses.

Deciding To Vote “Yes”

In deciding whether to vote in favor of a proposition, the best policy may be to vote “yes” only if every aspect of the measure is consistent with what the voter thinks are good ideas. If any aspect of a proposition is suspect, vote “no.” The total cost of the negative provisions may greatly exceed the value of the positive. Each proposition benefits some citizens, but may be disadvantageous to others.

The Propositions

Below is a review of the twelve 2020 propositions, including pertinent questions.

Proposition 14: Advocates issuing $5.5 billion in bonds for stem cell research. Although such research may be desirable, the use of bonds to finance is the most expensive way for taxpayers to pay for anything. The financing will cost at least an extra billion dollars. Given the current fiscal crisis, is this a need that should wait? What benefits will be derived from the research?

Proposition 15:  Ends tax breaks on commercial property. It amends the 40-year-old Proposition 13 tax measure in order to exclude property held by businesses and corporations, which are not people. Should older corporations have a permanent tax advantage over newer ones?  The measure will increase property tax revenue state wide, but adversely affect the profitability of commercial property investors. Some say the tax law will become more equitable while those who will pay more tax say it is unfair.

Proposition 16: Ends the ban on Affirmative Action. People who think we need Affirmative Action will vote to approve.

Proposition 17: Allows parolees to vote. At what point has the debt to society been repaid? When released from prison, have all dues to society been repaid? 

Proposition 18: Allows 17 year olds to vote in a primary if they will attain age 18 by Election Day. 

Proposition 19: Creates property tax loopholes, adding to those created by the original Proposition 13 of 40 years ago. Will this proposal widen inequities by exempting heirs from property reassessment? This is a complicated proposal sponsored by the California Board of Realtors.

Proposition 20: Reverses the trend towards leniency in the criminal justice system and is supported by law enforcement. This proposition circumvents the State Legislature.  Is the proposal a wise method of reducing crime?

Proposition 21: Promotes rent control, but discriminates by property type and age.  Can a better law be drafted?

Proposition 22: A special interest measure being promoted by Uber and Lyft to overturn a law passed last year to require the mega companies to pay a living wage. Unfortunately, the original law was not well written. The State Legislature has been working to amend the law to eliminate inequities. The two mega companies call their employees, “independent contractors,” to avoid paying benefits while exercising control over remuneration and work rules.  The public will need to weigh the cost of transportation versus the well-being of those who work for the companies.

Proposition 23: Another special interest proposal that will increase the cost of kidney dialysis in exchange for greater regulation by the state.

Proposition 24: Expands the right of citizens to privacy. It creates a new state agency to enforce this newly proposed law as well as existing privacy laws.  Is another state agency worthwhile to protect your privacy?

Proposition 25:  Another special interest law, this one from the Bail Bonds Industry.  The intent is to overturn a law created by the State Legislature replacing the bail system with release based on risk assessment. The bail bond system was faulted by penalizing the poor for inability to make bail while the wealthy can always afford to bail out.

Perhaps we need an initiative to limit the number of initiatives that can be placed on the ballot. Trying to evaluate all of the candidates for various public offices while mulling thru twelve initiatives seems rather much.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Bruce Frohman, California Ballot Propositions 2020

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Damon Woods says

    September 24, 2020 at 6:39 am

    Good article for a change. Voting no on most of these is the best option- especially prop 15. If this passes, expect the next proposition to remove all prop 13 protections, and everyone’s property tax will increase by 400% or more. Then, with that taken care of, you will see property values decline, thousands of businesses leave California and loads of properties left vacant. AFter this Pandemic, this is no way to treat the companies that employ workers…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Why YIMBYs are about to sue the daylights out of cities across the Bay Area
Housing advocates are about to deliver a message to the Bay Area: Comply with state…
www.sfchronicle.com
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty 'Law of the River' holds sway
At the heart of Colorado River crisis, the mighty ‘Law of the River’ holds sway
At the heart of tensions over water allotments from the Colorado River is a complex set of agreements and decrees known as the ‘Law of the River.’
www.latimes.com
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America's largest rainforest
Biden restores roadless protection to the Tongass, North America’s largest rainforest
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, a focus of political battles over old-growth logging and road-building in forests for decades, has received new protection from the Biden administration.
theconversation.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design