• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice

The Valley Citizen

Pursuing truth toward justice
  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About

More on Mapes Ranch Water Sales

July 26, 2022 By Eric Caine 5 Comments

July 25, attorneys for “Lyons Land Management and Mapes Ranch” issued a strong rebuttal to a letter to the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) from its former General Counsel that raised questions about Mapes Ranch’s use of MID water. The rebuttal argued the letter, “contains false accusations and incorrect information.” We summarized portions of the letter from Ronda Lucas on July 19.

Lucas, who served as MID’s General Counsel from early in 2016 until November 2018, reviewed Mapes Ranch’s 40 year agreement with MID for what Lucas called “gift water” because it is water that the ranch receives without recompense to the district. In her letter, Lucas also stated that Mapes Ranch had sold 10,000 acre feet of water to Del Puerto Water District (DPWD) in 2021 and 2022.

Lauren D Layne, an attorney for Baker, Manock and Jensen, a firm that represents Mapes Ranch, wrote in a letter to MID that Lucas had overstated the volume of the sale:

“Mapes Ranch and DPWD estimated that Mapes Ranch had delivered
approximately 6,800 acre-feet (“AF”) of water by April 20, 2022, leaving approximately 3,200 AF of the original 10,000 AF contemplated by the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement undelivered.”

After the underlined emphasis on the corrected volume of the sale, Layne went on (in bold print) to explain further terms of the agreement between Mapes Ranch and DPWD:

“The Extension of2021 (sic) Pilot Program Agreement merely allowed Mapes Ranch to continue to deliver water to DPWD through June 30, 2022 up to the original 10,000 AF contemplated by the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement on the same terms and conditions as are stated in the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement. The extension did not add an additional 10,000 AF as falsely asserted by Ms. Lucas.”

The strongly worded letter included the claim that Lucas,

“has misread and misinterpreted the above-referenced agreements and is fabricating ‘issues’ in a failed effort to support her fishing expedition request for documents that are not suitable for production by MID.”

Repeatedly emphasizing that, “no protests or objections were submitted during the two-year process or at the hearings where the 1983 MID-Mapes Ranch Agreement was approved,” Layne went on to argue that “there has been no land subsidence within the monitored area” and “any change in the depth of water has been negligible.”

Mapes Ranch sign and flag

Forty years ago, no one could foresee the effects drought and climate change have brought to the San Joaquin Valley, especially with regard to water use and water rights. Since that time, there has also been a much better understanding of the relationship between groundwater and surface water, especially as it applies to infiltration of groundwater from rivers, streams, and flood irrigation.

If, for example, one is pumping groundwater near rivers and streams and change in groundwater levels is “negligible,” it’s reasonable to assume that the consistent groundwater level is due to infiltration from the adjacent rivers and streams.

According to the United States Geological Survey, the science is clear:

“Groundwater discharge is a critical part of flow in most streams–and the more we pump below the ground, the more we deplete water flowing down the stream,” said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. “When viewed over the long term, it is one big zero-sum game.”

While attorneys for Mapes Ranch may argue that it’s “absurd” to assume MID water delivered to the Mapes Ranch might end up out of the district, no one is tracking whether MID water delivered to the Mapes Ranch ends of being part of the ranch’s groundwater recharge system, nor is anyone measuring the effects of pumping on the three rivers that surround the ranch. Both issues need to be addressed, though only one is necessarily pertinent to MID’s Board of Directors.

The question for MID Directors is not whether anyone objected to the Mapes agreement forty years ago. Rather, today’s MID Directors need to justify what benefits the arrangement with Mapes Ranch offers today’s ratepayer. Variously referred to as, “spillwater, tailwater,” or “gift water,” MID water that ends up on the Mapes Ranch, however it  gets there, appears to offer little or no benefit to the vast majority of MID ratepayers.

The larger issue is who owns the water. Given increasing shortages, any depletion of water by entrepreneurs that serves narrow interests at the expense of the Public Trust should at the very least be evaluated via robust Environmental Impact Review. The “negligible” effect on groundwater levels after pumping large volumes of water near rivers and streams suggests equally large volumes of inflow from those same rivers and streams. According to USGS Hydrologist Paul Barlow, that’s a matter of great public interest:

“Streamflow depletion caused by pumping is an important water-resource management issue across the nation because of the adverse effects that reduced flows can have on aquatic ecosystems, the availability of surface water, and the quality and aesthetic value of streams and rivers.”

Ultimately, the public has a right to know the details when a public resource is commodified for private use and gain.

 

.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: Mapes Ranch water sales, Ronda Lucas Attorney at Law

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gary Wheeler says

    July 26, 2022 at 8:49 pm

    Water is a fixed commodity, greed on the other hand is infinite.

    A letter from MID granting free water for a while is not worth the paper it is written on. It is a temporary gift. Written in times of plenty. It is not a contract!

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      July 27, 2022 at 7:17 am

      Gary Wheeler: There is a valid contract. Yes, it was written in times of plenty, but it is a contract. No question that these times require different measures, but the contract is valid.

      Reply
      • Gary Wheeler says

        July 27, 2022 at 7:46 pm

        Its just a letter to allow water. A worthless “promise”. A contract on the other hand has certain provisions to be valid. Signed by both parties. Dated. Something given, something received. And it has to be legal to be binding. Quid pro quo in Latin. What did Mapes promise MID?! Nothing?!

        Seems in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act to me!

        Reply
        • Eric Caine says

          July 28, 2022 at 5:49 am

          Mr. Wheeler: You are confusing current letters with the 1983 contract, which is valid and binding. You are correct that MID gets nothing after million dollar fee Mapes paid to enter the district. However, there is a contract.

          Reply
  2. Big Facte O'Plenty says

    July 29, 2022 at 1:56 pm

    all persons do not have equal ( water ) rights, while the big American flag flys high over many greedy homes often attached to the MID poles.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

Gimme Shelter: Mayor Karen Bass on homelessness and the California housing crisis
Gimme Shelter: Mayor Karen Bass on homelessness and the California housing crisis
Liam Dillon and Ben Oreskes of the L.A. Times interview Mayor Karen Bass about homelessness and housing problems in California.
calmatters.org
Judge Luttig Has a Warning for America
Judge Luttig Has a Warning for America
Our democracy is “under vicious, unsustainable, and unendurable attack” from within…
morningshots.thebulwark.com
Rupert Murdoch has fuelled polarisation of society, Barack Obama says
Rupert Murdoch has fuelled polarisation of society, Barack Obama says
Former US president tells Sydney audience that media coverage has helped exacerbate divisions and that we no longer have a “shared story”
www.theguardian.com
California faces catastrophic flood dangers ? and a need to invest billions in protection
California faces catastrophic flood dangers and a need to invest billions in protection
A new state plan for the Central Valley calls for spending as much as $30 billion over 30 years to prepare for the dangers.
www.latimes.com
Oakland will get millions for the ?inhumane? crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it?s not enough
Oakland will get millions for the “inhumane” crisis at one huge homeless encampment. Officials say it’s not enough
Gavin Newsom’s administration has awarded Oakland a $4.7 million grant to come up with…
www.sfchronicle.com
Alaska?s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Alaska’s Fisheries Are Collapsing. This Congresswoman Is Taking on the Industry She Says Is to Blame.
Mary Peltola won her election by campaigning on a platform to save the state’s prized fisheries. A powerful fishing lobby is standing in her way.
www.politico.com
Jimmy Carter's final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
Jimmy Carter’s final foe: A parasitic worm that preyed on millions in Africa and Asia
One of former President Carter’s biggest hopes is wiping out an infectious parasitic disease that’s plagued humans for millennia. How close is he?
www.latimes.com
Climate Extremes Threaten California?s Central Valley Songbirds - Eos
Climate Extremes Threaten California’s Central Valley Songbirds – Eos
A “nestbox highway” in California’s Central Valley is guiding songbirds to safe nesting sites and giving scientists a peek at fledgling success in a changing climate.
eos.org
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Alaska Republican touts benefits of children being abused to death
Republican David Eastman suggested the death of child abuse victims could be a “cost savings” to wider society.
www.newsweek.com
Editorial: Newsom's drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Editorial: Newsom’s drought order amid wet winter threatens iconic California species
Gov. Gavin Newsom has effectively ended environmental regulations protecting California rivers and migratory fish by extending drought-year waivers.
www.latimes.com
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says
As of Thursday, just two of the more than 70 residents of McPherson Square had been placed in permanent D.C. housing.
www.washingtonpost.com
More Building Won?t Make Housing Affordable
More Building Won’t Make Housing Affordable
America’s housing crisis has reached unfathomable proportions. But new construction isn’t enough to solve it.
newrepublic.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design