• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Valley Citizen

Nature, Environment, History & Politics

The Valley Citizen

  • Arts
  • Education
  • Environment
  • History
  • Nature
  • Politics
  • Wit
  • About
  • RSS Icon

More on Mapes Ranch Water Sales

July 26, 2022 By Eric Caine 5 Comments

July 25, attorneys for “Lyons Land Management and Mapes Ranch” issued a strong rebuttal to a letter to the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) from its former General Counsel that raised questions about Mapes Ranch’s use of MID water. The rebuttal argued the letter, “contains false accusations and incorrect information.” We summarized portions of the letter from Ronda Lucas on July 19.

Lucas, who served as MID’s General Counsel from early in 2016 until November 2018, reviewed Mapes Ranch’s 40 year agreement with MID for what Lucas called “gift water” because it is water that the ranch receives without recompense to the district. In her letter, Lucas also stated that Mapes Ranch had sold 10,000 acre feet of water to Del Puerto Water District (DPWD) in 2021 and 2022.

Lauren D Layne, an attorney for Baker, Manock and Jensen, a firm that represents Mapes Ranch, wrote in a letter to MID that Lucas had overstated the volume of the sale:

“Mapes Ranch and DPWD estimated that Mapes Ranch had delivered
approximately 6,800 acre-feet (“AF”) of water by April 20, 2022, leaving approximately 3,200 AF of the original 10,000 AF contemplated by the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement undelivered.”

After the underlined emphasis on the corrected volume of the sale, Layne went on (in bold print) to explain further terms of the agreement between Mapes Ranch and DPWD:

“The Extension of2021 (sic) Pilot Program Agreement merely allowed Mapes Ranch to continue to deliver water to DPWD through June 30, 2022 up to the original 10,000 AF contemplated by the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement on the same terms and conditions as are stated in the 2021 Pilot Program Agreement. The extension did not add an additional 10,000 AF as falsely asserted by Ms. Lucas.”

The strongly worded letter included the claim that Lucas,

“has misread and misinterpreted the above-referenced agreements and is fabricating ‘issues’ in a failed effort to support her fishing expedition request for documents that are not suitable for production by MID.”

Repeatedly emphasizing that, “no protests or objections were submitted during the two-year process or at the hearings where the 1983 MID-Mapes Ranch Agreement was approved,” Layne went on to argue that “there has been no land subsidence within the monitored area” and “any change in the depth of water has been negligible.”

Mapes Ranch sign and flag

Forty years ago, no one could foresee the effects drought and climate change have brought to the San Joaquin Valley, especially with regard to water use and water rights. Since that time, there has also been a much better understanding of the relationship between groundwater and surface water, especially as it applies to infiltration of groundwater from rivers, streams, and flood irrigation.

If, for example, one is pumping groundwater near rivers and streams and change in groundwater levels is “negligible,” it’s reasonable to assume that the consistent groundwater level is due to infiltration from the adjacent rivers and streams.

According to the United States Geological Survey, the science is clear:

“Groundwater discharge is a critical part of flow in most streams–and the more we pump below the ground, the more we deplete water flowing down the stream,” said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. “When viewed over the long term, it is one big zero-sum game.”

While attorneys for Mapes Ranch may argue that it’s “absurd” to assume MID water delivered to the Mapes Ranch might end up out of the district, no one is tracking whether MID water delivered to the Mapes Ranch ends of being part of the ranch’s groundwater recharge system, nor is anyone measuring the effects of pumping on the three rivers that surround the ranch. Both issues need to be addressed, though only one is necessarily pertinent to MID’s Board of Directors.

The question for MID Directors is not whether anyone objected to the Mapes agreement forty years ago. Rather, today’s MID Directors need to justify what benefits the arrangement with Mapes Ranch offers today’s ratepayer. Variously referred to as, “spillwater, tailwater,” or “gift water,” MID water that ends up on the Mapes Ranch, however it  gets there, appears to offer little or no benefit to the vast majority of MID ratepayers.

The larger issue is who owns the water. Given increasing shortages, any depletion of water by entrepreneurs that serves narrow interests at the expense of the Public Trust should at the very least be evaluated via robust Environmental Impact Review. The “negligible” effect on groundwater levels after pumping large volumes of water near rivers and streams suggests equally large volumes of inflow from those same rivers and streams. According to USGS Hydrologist Paul Barlow, that’s a matter of great public interest:

“Streamflow depletion caused by pumping is an important water-resource management issue across the nation because of the adverse effects that reduced flows can have on aquatic ecosystems, the availability of surface water, and the quality and aesthetic value of streams and rivers.”

Ultimately, the public has a right to know the details when a public resource is commodified for private use and gain.

 

.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: Mapes Ranch water sales, Ronda Lucas Attorney at Law

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gary Wheeler says

    July 26, 2022 at 8:49 pm

    Water is a fixed commodity, greed on the other hand is infinite.

    A letter from MID granting free water for a while is not worth the paper it is written on. It is a temporary gift. Written in times of plenty. It is not a contract!

    Reply
    • Eric Caine says

      July 27, 2022 at 7:17 am

      Gary Wheeler: There is a valid contract. Yes, it was written in times of plenty, but it is a contract. No question that these times require different measures, but the contract is valid.

      Reply
      • Gary Wheeler says

        July 27, 2022 at 7:46 pm

        Its just a letter to allow water. A worthless “promise”. A contract on the other hand has certain provisions to be valid. Signed by both parties. Dated. Something given, something received. And it has to be legal to be binding. Quid pro quo in Latin. What did Mapes promise MID?! Nothing?!

        Seems in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act to me!

        Reply
        • Eric Caine says

          July 28, 2022 at 5:49 am

          Mr. Wheeler: You are confusing current letters with the 1983 contract, which is valid and binding. You are correct that MID gets nothing after million dollar fee Mapes paid to enter the district. However, there is a contract.

          Reply
  2. Big Facte O'Plenty says

    July 29, 2022 at 1:56 pm

    all persons do not have equal ( water ) rights, while the big American flag flys high over many greedy homes often attached to the MID poles.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Some comments may be held for moderation.

Primary Sidebar

Off The Wire

WATCH: The Moment When The ?2,000 Mules? Folks Admit Their Supposed Evidence Is Nonsense
WATCH: The Moment When The “2,000 Mules” Folks Admit Their Supposed Evidence Is Nonsense
True believers in Donald Trump?s lies about the 2020 election gathered in…
talkingpointsmemo.com
Four things to know about Colorado River water in California
Four things to know about Colorado River water in California
As California and six other western states scramble to reach a deal to cut use of Colorado River water, what will the federal government do?
calmatters.org
A disastrous 'megaflood' flood in sunny and dry California? It's happened before
A disastrous ‘megaflood’ flood in sunny and dry California? It’s happened before
Scientists say climate change increases the likelihood of the recurrence of a ‘megaflood’ like the Great Flood of 1862.
www.usatoday.com
'He Was a Crook'
‘He Was a Crook’
www.theatlantic.com
Opinion | When America Joined the Cult of the Confederacy
Opinion | When America Joined the Cult of the Confederacy
By renaming military bases, the Defense Department dismantles an enduring legacy of the Lost Cause.
www.nytimes.com
What?s driving the massive, destructive rainfalls around the country
What’s driving the massive, destructive rainfalls around the country
“The infrastructure we have is really built for a climate we are not living in anymore,” said one scientist who studies extreme precipitation.
www.washingtonpost.com
How California stands to gain from historic new climate and energy bill
How California stands to gain from historic new climate and energy bill
Billions for electric cars, solar and wind power are expected to boost state’s clean energy efforts and industries
www.mercurynews.com
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals
www.newyorker.com
Water wars in a drying California: New money vs. old power in San Joaquin Valley
Water wars in a drying California: New money vs. old power in San Joaquin Valley
www.mercurynews.com
History of DDT ocean dumping off L.A. coast even worse than expected, EPA finds
History of DDT ocean dumping off L.A. coast even worse than expected, EPA finds
Barrels of DDT waste, along with other chemicals, were likely poured directly into the ocean near Catalina Island, according to federal regulators.
www.latimes.com
The Tiny Bird Ruining East Coast Beach Vacations
The Tiny Bird Ruining East Coast Beach Vacations
Meet the piping plover, an adorable little bird whose tenuous existence shuts down roads and beaches right in the peak of summer.
www.thedailybeast.com
Will the last person to leave Phoenix please turn off the sun?
Will the last person to leave Phoenix please turn off the sun?
Asking when Phoenix will become uninhabitable means asking who has the resources to survive — and eventually, the rich might be the only ones left
www.salon.com
California drought official quits, blasting Newsom for 'gut wrenching' inaction
California drought official quits, blasting Newsom for ‘gut wrenching’ inaction
A state water board official has resigned, claiming the Newsom administration has “nearly eviscerated” the board’s ability to confront drought.
www.latimes.com

Find us on Facebook

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Footer

The Valley Citizen
PO Box 156
Downtown Bear Postal
1509 K Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Email us at:
thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Subscribe for Free

* indicates required

Search

• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 The Valley Citizen

Dedicated to the memory of John Michael Flint. Contact us at thevalleycitizen@sbcglobal.net

Editor and publisher: Eric Caine

Website customization and maintenance by Susan Henley Design